A304236: Triangle T(n,k) = T(n-1,k) + 3*T(n-2,k-1) for k = 0..floor(n/2), with T(0,0) = 1, T(n,k) = 0 for n or k < 0, read by rows.
A304236 nonnegative coefficients
Proved for all n: all roots real, in (−∞, 0] · coefficients of one sign · interlacing (weak) · Hadamard kernel basis map preserves real roots what this means
Rows ?
| n | x0 | x1 | x2 | x3 | Pn(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | ||
| 3 | 1 | 6 | 7 | ||
| 4 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 19 | |
| 5 | 1 | 12 | 27 | 40 | |
| 6 | 1 | 15 | 54 | 27 | 97 |
| 7 | 1 | 18 | 90 | 108 | 217 |
Generated b-files: A006130 (row sums), A304236 ?
Computed in your browser ?
Other recurrences
Γ-polynomial · proved equal for all n (proof step)
Technical details
- Node id
n-e189038e95d51606· revision 2 · JSON- Definition source
oeis_catalog:A304236derived:gamma_polynomial(equal bye-46ee23218258c2c9)- Fingerprint
f6-3a3e895c37a3d3df
Observed on the stored rows ?
- Degrees: 0, 0, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5, 5, 6, 6, 7 (half affine: slope 1, intercept 0)
- Palindromic rows: no
- γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
- Nonnegative coefficients (
nonn): yes - Only rational roots (
rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no
OEIS matches ?
- A006130: row sums, 15 terms agree OEIS nonn (row-sum match: finite agreement only) · view at the OEIS · generated b-file 200 terms from n = 0 ?
- A304236: triangle, 64 terms agree, 15 full rows row lengths from the atlas (tabf) OEIS nonn in polytool catalog · view at the OEIS · generated b-file 992 terms from n = 0 ?
A generated b-file is computed from the node's definition along the row alignment of its OEIS link and starts at the entry's offset. It is an identification on a finite prefix, not a proof that the node and the OEIS entry agree for every n.
OEIS submission text ?
Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula
%F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows.
For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched;
the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a
finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.
The atlas's own rows: n = 0, …, ascending powers of x
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 0: 1; 1: 1; 2: 1, 3; 3: 1, 6; 4: 1, 9, 9; 5: 1, 12, 27; 6: 1, 15, 54, 27; 7: 1, 18, 90, 108; 8: 1, 21, 135, 270, 81; 9: 1, 24, 189, 540, 405;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy P(n,x) = P(n-1,x) + 3*x*P(n-2,x) for n >= 2, with P(0,x) = 1, P(1,x) = 1.
%t MathematicaP[0, x_] := 1;
P[1, x_] := 1;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[P[n - 1, x] + 3*x*P[n - 2, x]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 1; v[2] = 1; for(n = 2, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = v[i - 1] + 3*x*v[i - 2]); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
A304236: triangle, offset 0, from the row P0
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 0: 1; 1: 1; 2: 1, 3; 3: 1, 6; 4: 1, 9, 9; 5: 1, 12, 27; 6: 1, 15, 54, 27; 7: 1, 18, 90, 108; 8: 1, 21, 135, 270, 81; 9: 1, 24, 189, 540, 405;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy P(n,x) = P(n-1,x) + 3*x*P(n-2,x) for n >= 2, with P(0,x) = 1, P(1,x) = 1.
%t MathematicaP[0, x_] := 1;
P[1, x_] := 1;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[P[n - 1, x] + 3*x*P[n - 2, x]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 1; v[2] = 1; for(n = 2, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = v[i - 1] + 3*x*v[i - 2]); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
Proved properties
-
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-0050d566ad712b7d,e-64b74724257dbeaa -
Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 0: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-0050d566ad712b7d,e-64b74724257dbeaa -
Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 0, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-0050d566ad712b7d,e-64b74724257dbeaa -
Interlacing of consecutive rows. Rows P_(m-1), P_m interlace (weak, previous interlaces next) for every m >= 1
The roots of consecutive polynomials alternate on the real line.by the cited steps:
e-0050d566ad712b7d -
Basis map preserves real-rootedness. Basis map u^k -> P_k sends roots in (-inf, 0] to roots in (-inf, 0]: every PF input has a real-rooted image with every root <= -c/b = 0
The linear map sending x^k to the k-th polynomial of the sequence turns polynomials with roots in one interval into real-rooted ones.by the cited steps:
e-928936169e50a847 -
Basis map preserves real-rootedness. Basis map u^k -> P_k sends roots in (-inf, 0] to roots in (-inf, 0]: every PF input has a PF image (zero allowed)
The linear map sending x^k to the k-th polynomial of the sequence turns polynomials with roots in one interval into real-rooted ones.by the cited steps:
e-928936169e50a847
Proof chains
4 incoming proof steps. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON
-
basis_map_theorem
e-928936169e50a847root: theorem checkConstant-current basis map [Bra15, Thm 8.5] polytool RealRooted orderTwoBasis_pf_equivalences RealRooted basisTransform_orderTwoBasis_preserves_bounded_pf_iff ?
-
definition_equality
e-46ee23218258c2c9root: theorem checkOre-algebra identity of two definitions polytool ?
-
gamma_polynomial scale 1, shift 0
e-64b74724257dbeaaGamma criterion RealRooted IsGammaExpansion.isRealRooted_and_hasRootsNonpos_iff ?
-
premise (sequence):
Pascal-(1,3,1) array.
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
theorem_check liu_wang_derivative_lag
e-fba968684828f914root: theorem checkLiu–Wang theorem with a lag row [LW07, Thm 2.1] RealRooted ?
-
preserver_image reversal, shift 0
e-86685874cd5f1179Affine, reversal and Möbius substitutions (elementary) polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
Pascal-(1,3,1) array.
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
premise (sequence):
Pascal-(1,3,1) array.
-
-
premise (sequence):
Pascal-(1,3,1) array.
-
parent_provers paper_theorem
e-0050d566ad712b7droot: theorem checkParent-row provers of polytool polytool ?
Used in 12 proof steps
e-3091186ded9433dbbasis_map (A007318) → basis_map_A007318 of Triangle T(n,k) = T(n-1,k) + 3*T(n-2,k-1) for k = 0..floor(n/2), wit…e-7482884421cc3299basis_map (A013611) → basis_map_A013611 of Triangle T(n,k) = T(n-1,k) + 3*T(n-2,k-1) for k = 0..floor(n/2), wit…e-ab47cf01b7fbfda0basis_map (A013610) → basis_map_A013610 of Triangle T(n,k) = T(n-1,k) + 3*T(n-2,k-1) for k = 0..floor(n/2), wit…e-c25a9d9d3ec02f57basis_map (A008277) → basis_map_A008277 of Triangle T(n,k) = T(n-1,k) + 3*T(n-2,k-1) for k = 0..floor(n/2), wit…e-c77d0879f7f3e65bbasis_map (A013609) → basis_map_A013609 of Triangle T(n,k) = T(n-1,k) + 3*T(n-2,k-1) for k = 0..floor(n/2), wit…e-4cdd530d16220003preserver_image (affine, shift 0) → basis_map_A007318 of Triangle T(n,k) = T(n-1,k) + 3*T(n-2,k-1) for k = 0..floor(n/2), wit…e-4e4cfdea6d7e0f6fpreserver_image (euler_polynomial, shift 0) → theta_plus_one_squared of Triangle T(n,k) = T(n-1,k) + 3*T(n-2,k-1) for k = 0..floor(n/2)…e-825bd9c47e6b8deepreserver_image (euler_polynomial, shift 0) → theta_plus_one of Triangle T(n,k) = T(n-1,k) + 3*T(n-2,k-1) for k = 0..floor(n/2), with T…e-8635ad6e77f468eapreserver_image (derivative_polynomial, shift 0) → one_plus_derivative of Triangle T(n,k) = T(n-1,k) + 3*T(n-2,k-1) for k = 0..floor(n/2), w…e-916dd5eda11218dbpreserver_image (derivative_polynomial, shift 0) → derivative of Triangle T(n,k) = T(n-1,k) + 3*T(n-2,k-1) for k = 0..floor(n/2), with T(0,0…e-1c5b9a0a4dd25652veronese_section (r=2, j=0, shift 0) → veronese_section_2_0 of Triangle T(n,k) = T(n-1,k) + 3*T(n-2,k-1) for k = 0..floor(n/2), …e-5a301867196b7d95veronese_section (r=2, j=1, shift 0) → veronese_section_2_1 of Triangle T(n,k) = T(n-1,k) + 3*T(n-2,k-1) for k = 0..floor(n/2), …
Related sequences ?
No candidate equalities or related sequences.
References
- [Bra15] Petter Brändén. Unimodality, log-concavity, real-rootedness and beyond. Handbook of enumerative combinatorics, :437–483, March 2015. doi:10.1201/b18255-10
- [LW07] Lily L. Liu and Yi Wang. A unified approach to polynomial sequences with only real zeros. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 38(4):542–560, May 2007. doi:10.1016/j.aam.2006.02.003