A304236 → (θ+1)²
nonnegative coefficients
Proved for all n: all roots real, in (−∞, 0] · coefficients of one sign · Hadamard kernel what this means
Rows ?
| n | x0 | x1 | x2 | x3 | Pn(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2 | 1 | 12 | 13 | ||
| 3 | 1 | 24 | 25 | ||
| 4 | 1 | 36 | 81 | 118 | |
| 5 | 1 | 48 | 243 | 292 | |
| 6 | 1 | 60 | 486 | 432 | 979 |
| 7 | 1 | 72 | 810 | 1728 | 2611 |
Computed in your browser ?
Technical details
- Node id
n-24dd20155389652b· revision 1 · JSON- Definition source
derived:theta_plus_one_squared- Fingerprint
f6-d5e3f78a12ef257a
Observed on the stored rows ?
- Degrees: 0, 0, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5, 5, 6, 6, 7 (half affine: slope 1, intercept 0)
- Palindromic rows: no
- γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
- Nonnegative coefficients (
nonn): yes - Only rational roots (
rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no
OEIS matches ?
No OEIS matches.
OEIS submission text ?
Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula
%F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows.
For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched;
the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a
finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.
The atlas's own rows: n = 0, …, ascending powers of x
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 0: 1; 1: 1; 2: 1, 12; 3: 1, 24; 4: 1, 36, 81; 5: 1, 48, 243; 6: 1, 60, 486, 432; 7: 1, 72, 810, 1728; 8: 1, 84, 1215, 4320, 2025; 9: 1, 96, 1701, 8640, 10125;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy (n^2+n+(9*n^3-6*n)*x+(9*n^4+9*n^3)*x^2)*P(n,x) = (n^2+n+(9*n^3+24*n^2-6*n-24)*x+(9*n^4+99*n^3+72*n^2-126*n-36)*x^2+(54*n^4+216*n^3+162*n^2-216*n-216)*x^3)*P(n-1,x) - ((n+1)*x+(9*n^2+30*n+18)*x^2+(9*n^3+153*n^2+288*n+108)*x^3+(108*n^3+540*n^2+864*n+432)*x^4)*d/dx P(n-1,x) for n >= 1, with P(0,x) = 1.
%t MathematicaP[0, x_] := 1;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[Together[((n^2 + n + (9*n^3 + 24*n^2 - 6*n - 24)*x + (9*n^4 + 99*n^3 + 72*n^2 - 126*n - 36)*x^2 + (54*n^4 + 216*n^3 + 162*n^2 - 216*n - 216)*x^3)*P[n - 1, x] - ((n + 1)*x + (9*n^2 + 30*n + 18)*x^2 + (9*n^3 + 153*n^2 + 288*n + 108)*x^3 + (108*n^3 + 540*n^2 + 864*n + 432)*x^4)*D[P[n - 1, x], x])/(n^2 + n + (9*n^3 - 6*n)*x + (9*n^4 + 9*n^3)*x^2)]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 1; for(n = 1, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = ((n^2 + n + (9*n^3 + 24*n^2 - 6*n - 24)*x + (9*n^4 + 99*n^3 + 72*n^2 - 126*n - 36)*x^2 + (54*n^4 + 216*n^3 + 162*n^2 - 216*n - 216)*x^3)*v[i - 1] - ((n + 1)*x + (9*n^2 + 30*n + 18)*x^2 + (9*n^3 + 153*n^2 + 288*n + 108)*x^3 + (108*n^3 + 540*n^2 + 864*n + 432)*x^4)*deriv(v[i - 1], x))/(n^2 + n + (9*n^3 - 6*n)*x + (9*n^4 + 9*n^3)*x^2)); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
Proved properties
-
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-4e4cfdea6d7e0f6f -
Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 0: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-4e4cfdea6d7e0f6f -
Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 0, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-4e4cfdea6d7e0f6f
Proof chains
1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON
-
preserver_image euler_polynomial, shift 0
e-4e4cfdea6d7e0f6fLaguerre’s theorem on multiplier sequences [SP14; Bra15, Thm 40] polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle T(n,k) = T(n-1,k) + 3*T(n-2,k-1) for k = 0..floor(n/2), with T(0,0) = 1, T(n,k) = 0 for n or k < 0, read by ro…
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
parent_provers paper_theorem
e-0050d566ad712b7droot: theorem checkParent-row provers of polytool polytool ?
-
gamma_polynomial scale 1, shift 0
e-64b74724257dbeaaGamma criterion RealRooted IsGammaExpansion.isRealRooted_and_hasRootsNonpos_iff ?
-
premise (sequence):
Pascal-(1,3,1) array.
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
theorem_check liu_wang_derivative_lag
e-fba968684828f914root: theorem checkLiu–Wang theorem with a lag row [LW07, Thm 2.1] RealRooted ?
-
preserver_image reversal, shift 0
e-86685874cd5f1179Affine, reversal and Möbius substitutions (elementary) polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
Pascal-(1,3,1) array.
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
premise (sequence):
Pascal-(1,3,1) array.
-
-
premise (sequence):
Pascal-(1,3,1) array.
-
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle T(n,k) = T(n-1,k) + 3*T(n-2,k-1) for k = 0..floor(n/2), with T(0,0) = 1, T(n,k) = 0 for n or k < 0, read by ro…
Related sequences ?
No candidate equalities or related sequences.
References
- [Bra15] Petter Brändén. Unimodality, log-concavity, real-rootedness and beyond. Handbook of enumerative combinatorics, :437–483, March 2015. doi:10.1201/b18255-10
- [LW07] Lily L. Liu and Yi Wang. A unified approach to polynomial sequences with only real zeros. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 38(4):542–560, May 2007. doi:10.1016/j.aam.2006.02.003
- [SP14] J Schur and G Polya. Über zwei Arten von Faktorenfolgen in der Theorie der algebraischen Gleichungen. J. Reine Angew. Math., 1914.