A145597: Generalized Narayana numbers, T(n, k) = 3/(n + 1)*binomial(n + 1, k + 2)*binomial(n + 1, k - 1), triangular array read by rows.
A145597 palindromic γ-positive nonnegative coefficients
Proved for all n: all roots real, in (−∞, 0) · coefficients of one sign · interlacing · Hadamard kernel what this means
Rows ?
| n | x0 | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | Pn(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 | ||||||
| 2 | 6 | 15 | 6 | 27 | |||||
| 3 | 10 | 45 | 45 | 10 | 110 | ||||
| 4 | 15 | 105 | 189 | 105 | 15 | 429 | |||
| 5 | 21 | 210 | 588 | 588 | 210 | 21 | 1638 | ||
| 6 | 28 | 378 | 1512 | 2352 | 1512 | 378 | 28 | 6188 | |
| 7 | 36 | 630 | 3402 | 7560 | 7560 | 3402 | 630 | 36 | 23256 |
Generated b-files: A003517 (row sums), A145597, A145597 (reversed triangle) ?
Computed in your browser ?
Other recurrences
Reversed rows · proved equal for all n (proof step)
Technical details
- Node id
n-bb74f03367de3ec8· revision 2 · JSON- Definition source
oeis_catalog:A145597derived:reversal(equal bye-d32219abddaaed67)- Fingerprint
f6-cbec7e2198ae346b
Observed on the stored rows ?
- Degrees: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 (affine: slope 1, intercept 0)
- Palindromic rows: yes
- γ-positive (gamma_positive): yes
- Nonnegative coefficients (
nonn): yes - Only rational roots (
rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no
OEIS matches ?
- A145597: triangle, 51 terms agree, 9 full rows row-aligned (tabl) OEIS nonn in polytool catalog · view at the OEIS · generated b-file 990 terms from n = 2 ?
- A145597: reversed triangle, 51 terms agree, 9 full rows row-aligned (tabl) OEIS nonn in polytool catalog · view at the OEIS · generated b-file 990 terms from n = 2 ?
- A003517: row sums, 15 terms agree OEIS nonn (row-sum match: finite agreement only) · view at the OEIS · generated b-file 200 terms from n = 2 ?
A generated b-file is computed from the node's definition along the row alignment of its OEIS link and starts at the entry's offset. It is an identification on a finite prefix, not a proof that the node and the OEIS entry agree for every n.
OEIS submission text ?
Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula
%F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows.
For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched;
the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a
finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.
The atlas's own rows: n = 0, …, ascending powers of x
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 0: 1; 1: 3, 3; 2: 6, 15, 6; 3: 10, 45, 45, 10; 4: 15, 105, 189, 105, 15; 5: 21, 210, 588, 588, 210, 21; 6: 28, 378, 1512, 2352, 1512, 378, 28; 7: 36, 630, 3402, 7560, 7560, 3402, 630, 36; 8: 45, 990, 6930, 20790, 29700, 20790, 6930, 990, 45; 9: 55, 1485, 13068, 50820, 98010, 98010, 50820, 13068, 1485, 55;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy (n^2+6*n)*P(n,x) = (2*n^2+9*n+10+(2*n^2+9*n+10)*x)*P(n-1,x) - (n^2+3*n+2-(2*n^2+6*n+4)*x+(n^2+3*n+2)*x^2)*P(n-2,x) for n >= 2, with P(0,x) = 1, P(1,x) = 3 + 3*x.
%t MathematicaP[0, x_] := 1;
P[1, x_] := 3 + 3*x;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[Together[((2*n^2 + 9*n + 10 + (2*n^2 + 9*n + 10)*x)*P[n - 1, x] - (n^2 + 3*n + 2 - (2*n^2 + 6*n + 4)*x + (n^2 + 3*n + 2)*x^2)*P[n - 2, x])/(n^2 + 6*n)]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 1; v[2] = 3 + 3*x; for(n = 2, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = ((2*n^2 + 9*n + 10 + (2*n^2 + 9*n + 10)*x)*v[i - 1] - (n^2 + 3*n + 2 - (2*n^2 + 6*n + 4)*x + (n^2 + 3*n + 2)*x^2)*v[i - 2])/(n^2 + 6*n)); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
A145597: triangle, offset 2, from the row P0
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 2: 1; 3: 3, 3; 4: 6, 15, 6; 5: 10, 45, 45, 10; 6: 15, 105, 189, 105, 15; 7: 21, 210, 588, 588, 210, 21; 8: 28, 378, 1512, 2352, 1512, 378, 28; 9: 36, 630, 3402, 7560, 7560, 3402, 630, 36; 10: 45, 990, 6930, 20790, 29700, 20790, 6930, 990, 45; 11: 55, 1485, 13068, 50820, 98010, 98010, 50820, 13068, 1485, 55;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy (n^2+2*n-8)*P(n,x) = (2*n^2+n+(2*n^2+n)*x)*P(n-1,x) - (n^2-n-(2*n^2-2*n)*x+(n^2-n)*x^2)*P(n-2,x) for n >= 4, with P(2,x) = 1, P(3,x) = 3 + 3*x.
%t MathematicaP[2, x_] := 1;
P[3, x_] := 3 + 3*x;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[Together[((2*n^2 + n + (2*n^2 + n)*x)*P[n - 1, x] - (n^2 - n - (2*n^2 - 2*n)*x + (n^2 - n)*x^2)*P[n - 2, x])/(n^2 + 2*n - 8)]];
Table[PadRight[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], n - 1], {n, 2, 11}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N - 1)); v[1] = 1; v[2] = 3 + 3*x; for(n = 4, N, my(i = n - 1); v[i] = ((2*n^2 + n + (2*n^2 + n)*x)*v[i - 1] - (n^2 - n - (2*n^2 - 2*n)*x + (n^2 - n)*x^2)*v[i - 2])/(n^2 + 2*n - 8)); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c = concat(c, vector(n - 1 - #c)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i + 1, v[i])))};
T(11)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
A145597: reversed triangle, offset 2, from the row P0
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 2: 1; 3: 3, 3; 4: 6, 15, 6; 5: 10, 45, 45, 10; 6: 15, 105, 189, 105, 15; 7: 21, 210, 588, 588, 210, 21; 8: 28, 378, 1512, 2352, 1512, 378, 28; 9: 36, 630, 3402, 7560, 7560, 3402, 630, 36; 10: 45, 990, 6930, 20790, 29700, 20790, 6930, 990, 45; 11: 55, 1485, 13068, 50820, 98010, 98010, 50820, 13068, 1485, 55;
%F FormulaRow n lists the coefficients of P(n,x) in descending powers of x, where (n^2+2*n-8)*P(n,x) = (2*n^2+n+(2*n^2+n)*x)*P(n-1,x) - (n^2-n-(2*n^2-2*n)*x+(n^2-n)*x^2)*P(n-2,x) for n >= 4, with P(2,x) = 1, P(3,x) = 3 + 3*x.
%t MathematicaP[2, x_] := 1;
P[3, x_] := 3 + 3*x;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[Together[((2*n^2 + n + (2*n^2 + n)*x)*P[n - 1, x] - (n^2 - n - (2*n^2 - 2*n)*x + (n^2 - n)*x^2)*P[n - 2, x])/(n^2 + 2*n - 8)]];
Table[Reverse[PadRight[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], n - 1]], {n, 2, 11}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N - 1)); v[1] = 1; v[2] = 3 + 3*x; for(n = 4, N, my(i = n - 1); v[i] = ((2*n^2 + n + (2*n^2 + n)*x)*v[i - 1] - (n^2 - n - (2*n^2 - 2*n)*x + (n^2 - n)*x^2)*v[i - 2])/(n^2 + 2*n - 8)); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c = concat(c, vector(n - 1 - #c)); c = Vecrev(c); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i + 1, v[i])))};
T(11)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
Proved properties
-
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, +inf)
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-1670beb9ff565a7b -
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0)
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-bcb2e3135d28c083 -
Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 0: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-bcb2e3135d28c083,e-e8333902099cfe55 -
Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 0, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-bcb2e3135d28c083,e-e8333902099cfe55 -
Interlacing of consecutive rows. Rows P_(m-1), P_m interlace (strict, previous interlaces next) for every m >= 1
The roots of consecutive polynomials alternate on the real line.by the cited steps:
e-bcb2e3135d28c083 -
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-e8333902099cfe55
Proof chains
4 incoming proof steps. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON
-
definition_equality
e-d32219abddaaed67root: theorem checkOre-algebra identity of two definitions polytool ?
-
preserver_image reversal, shift 0
e-e8333902099cfe55Affine, reversal and Möbius substitutions (elementary) polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
Generalized Narayana numbers, T(n, k) = 3/(n + 1)*binomial(n + 1, k + 2)*binomial(n + 1, k - 1), triangular array read …
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
theorem_check three_term_recurrence
e-bcb2e3135d28c083root: theorem checkThree-term recurrence criterion [Sze39, §3.3; Fav35] polytool ?
-
-
premise (sequence):
Generalized Narayana numbers, T(n, k) = 3/(n + 1)*binomial(n + 1, k + 2)*binomial(n + 1, k - 1), triangular array read …
-
theorem_check three_term_recurrence
e-1670beb9ff565a7broot: theorem checkThree-term recurrence criterion [Sze39, §3.3; Fav35] polytool ?
-
↵ theorem_check three_term_recurrence
e-bcb2e3135d28c083(expanded above)
Used in 13 proof steps
e-0c862e94735a3472basis_map (A007318) → basis_map_A007318 of Generalized Narayana numbers, T(n, k) = 3/(n + 1)*binomial(n + 1, k …e-84c19921497cc665basis_map (A013611) → basis_map_A013611 of Generalized Narayana numbers, T(n, k) = 3/(n + 1)*binomial(n + 1, k …e-a01aa1ae1565a201basis_map (A008277) → basis_map_A008277 of Generalized Narayana numbers, T(n, k) = 3/(n + 1)*binomial(n + 1, k …e-b9848089af25f309basis_map (A013609) → basis_map_A013609 of Generalized Narayana numbers, T(n, k) = 3/(n + 1)*binomial(n + 1, k …e-d6186b9d95d911cdbasis_map (A013610) → basis_map_A013610 of Generalized Narayana numbers, T(n, k) = 3/(n + 1)*binomial(n + 1, k …e-fbbe2b618491014fgamma_polynomial (scale 1, shift 0) → gamma_polynomial of Generalized Narayana numbers, T(n, k) = 3/(n + 1)*binomial(n + 1, k +…e-1630b1dee35dc71dpreserver_image (euler_polynomial, shift 0) → theta_plus_one of Generalized Narayana numbers, T(n, k) = 3/(n + 1)*binomial(n + 1, k + 2…e-62daa9fe2e3f6ac3preserver_image (derivative_polynomial, shift 0) → one_plus_derivative of Generalized Narayana numbers, T(n, k) = 3/(n + 1)*binomial(n + 1, …e-8d309dafbf46f610preserver_image (mobius, shift 0) → mobius_x_over_x_plus_one of Generalized Narayana numbers, T(n, k) = 3/(n + 1)*binomial(n …e-9e81eec4f5e94153preserver_image (affine, shift 0) → basis_map_A007318 of Generalized Narayana numbers, T(n, k) = 3/(n + 1)*binomial(n + 1, k …e-b52fd312b43db576preserver_image (euler_polynomial, shift 0) → theta_plus_one_squared of Generalized Narayana numbers, T(n, k) = 3/(n + 1)*binomial(n + …e-dd8d38abcb6c1917preserver_image (derivative_polynomial, shift 0) → derivative of Generalized Narayana numbers, T(n, k) = 3/(n + 1)*binomial(n + 1, k + 2)*bi…e-e8333902099cfe55preserver_image (reversal, shift 0) → Generalized Narayana numbers, T(n, k) = 3/(n + 1)*binomial(n + 1, k + 2)*binomial(n + 1, …
Related sequences ?
No candidate equalities or related sequences.
References
- [Fav35] Jean Favard. Sur les polynômes de tchebicheff. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 200:2052–2053, 1935.
- [Sze39] G. Szegő. Orthogonal Polynomials. Colloquium publications, American Mathematical Society, 1939. doi:10.1090/coll/023