A109692 → basis A013609
nonnegative coefficients only rational roots
Proved for all n: all roots real, in (−∞, 0] · coefficients of one sign · interlacing (weak) · Hadamard kernel what this means
Rows ?
| n | x0 | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | Pn(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | ||||||
| 2 | 8 | 20 | 12 | 40 | |||||
| 3 | 48 | 200 | 272 | 120 | 640 | ||||
| 4 | 384 | 2272 | 4976 | 4768 | 1680 | 14080 | |||
| 5 | 3840 | 29632 | 90656 | 137248 | 102624 | 30240 | 394240 | ||
| 6 | 46080 | 440064 | 1739776 | 3641408 | 4250944 | 2620608 | 665280 | 13404160 | |
| 7 | 645120 | 7358976 | 35798528 | 96213888 | 154189824 | 147213056 | 77449728 | 17297280 | 536166400 |
Generated b-files: A049308 (row sums) ?
Computed in your browser ?
Technical details
- Node id
n-a6229b8a5ae7f968· revision 1 · JSON- Definition source
derived:basis_map_A013609- Fingerprint
f6-d445f8c61d9cb983
Observed on the stored rows ?
- Degrees: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 (affine: slope 1, intercept 0)
- Palindromic rows: no
- γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
- Nonnegative coefficients (
nonn): yes - Only rational roots (
rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): yes
OEIS matches ?
- A049308: row sums, 15 terms agree OEIS nonn (row-sum match: finite agreement only) · view at the OEIS · generated b-file 200 terms from n = 0 ?
A generated b-file is computed from the node's definition along the row alignment of its OEIS link and starts at the entry's offset. It is an identification on a finite prefix, not a proof that the node and the OEIS entry agree for every n.
OEIS submission text ?
Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula
%F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows.
For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched;
the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a
finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.
The atlas's own rows: n = 0, …, ascending powers of x
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 0: 1; 1: 2, 2; 2: 8, 20, 12; 3: 48, 200, 272, 120; 4: 384, 2272, 4976, 4768, 1680; 5: 3840, 29632, 90656, 137248, 102624, 30240; 6: 46080, 440064, 1739776, 3641408, 4250944, 2620608, 665280; 7: 645120, 7358976, 35798528, 96213888, 154189824, 147213056, 77449728, 17297280; 8: 10321920, 137097216, 793545728, 2613378048, 5353453824, 6981103616, 5655587328, 2600248320, 518918400; 9: 185794560, 2818695168, 18945128448, 74021359616, 185217022464, 307677295104, 339158094848, 239094438912, 97748974080, 17643225600;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy P(n,x) = (2*n+(4*n-2)*x)*P(n-1,x) for n >= 1, with P(0,x) = 1.
%t MathematicaP[0, x_] := 1;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[(2*n + (4*n - 2)*x)*P[n - 1, x]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 1; for(n = 1, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = (2*n + (4*n - 2)*x)*v[i - 1]); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
Proved properties
-
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-fb7c8bbf92df84a6 -
Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 0: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-fb7c8bbf92df84a6 -
Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 0, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-fb7c8bbf92df84a6 -
Interlacing of consecutive rows. Rows P_(m-1), P_m interlace (weak, unordered) for every m >= 1
The roots of consecutive polynomials alternate on the real line.by the cited steps:
e-fb7c8bbf92df84a6
Proof chains
1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON
-
basis_map A013609
e-fb7c8bbf92df84a6Geometric basis map (elementary) polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle of coefficients in expansion of (1+x)*(1+3x)*(1+5x)*(1+7x)*...*(1+(2n-1)x).
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
theorem_check liu_wang
e-e9da8c20b726baa3root: theorem checkLiu–Wang theorem [LW07, Thm 2.1, Cor 2.4] ?
-
parent_provers paper_theorem
e-63379a8a04b88f9croot: theorem checkParent-row provers of polytool polytool ?
-
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle of coefficients in expansion of (1+x)*(1+3x)*(1+5x)*(1+7x)*...*(1+(2n-1)x).
Related sequences ?
Same fingerprint (1)
Equal up to content, sign, reversal and a small index shift.
References
- [LW07] Lily L. Liu and Yi Wang. A unified approach to polynomial sequences with only real zeros. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 38(4):542–560, May 2007. doi:10.1016/j.aam.2006.02.003