A039756 → x ↦ x/(x+1)

nonnegative coefficients

Proved for all n: all roots real, in [−1, 0] · coefficients of one sign · Hadamard kernel what this means

Recurrence
\(\left(1 + 2\,x + x^{2}\right)\,P_{n}(x) = \left(1 + 2\,x - x^{2} - 4\,x^{3} - 2\,x^{4} + 2\,n x + 6\,n x^{2} + 6\,n x^{3} + 2\,n x^{4}\right)\,P_{n-1}(x) + \left(-2\,x^{2} - 6\,x^{3} - 6\,x^{4} - 2\,x^{5}\right)\,P_{n-1}'(x)\)
\(P_{0}(x) = 1\)

Rows ?

nx0x1x2x3x4x5x6x7Pn(1)
011
1123
216613
3112342471
4120112208116457
5130280100013966483355
61425903480907610232408827509
71561106980041636855688132028640248127

Generated b-files: A126390 (row sums) ?

Computed in your browser ?

Technical details
Node id
n-7ea74f9ff38a51f6 · revision 1 · JSON
Definition source
derived:mobius_x_over_x_plus_one
Fingerprint
f6-f9cef97b53c8c582

Observed on the stored rows ?

  • Degrees: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 (affine: slope 1, intercept 0)
  • Palindromic rows: no
  • γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
  • Nonnegative coefficients (nonn): yes
  • Only rational roots (rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no

OEIS matches ?

A generated b-file is computed from the node's definition along the row alignment of its OEIS link and starts at the entry's offset. It is an identification on a finite prefix, not a proof that the node and the OEIS entry agree for every n.

OEIS submission text ?

Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula %F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows. For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched; the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.

The atlas's own rows: n = 0, …, ascending powers of x
%e Example
Triangle begins:
  0: 1;
  1: 1,  2;
  2: 1,  6,    6;
  3: 1, 12,   34,    24;
  4: 1, 20,  112,   208,    116;
  5: 1, 30,  280,  1000,   1396,     648;
  6: 1, 42,  590,  3480,   9076,   10232,    4088;
  7: 1, 56, 1106,  9800,  41636,   85568,   81320,   28640;
  8: 1, 72, 1904, 23744, 150696,  497056,  844544,  696192,  219920;
  9: 1, 90, 3072, 51408, 458472, 2241456, 6026560, 8745792, 6382864, 1832224;
%F Formula
The row polynomials satisfy (1+2*x+x^2)*P(n,x) = (1+(2*n+2)*x+(6*n-1)*x^2+(6*n-4)*x^3+(2*n-2)*x^4)*P(n-1,x) - (2*x^2+6*x^3+6*x^4+2*x^5)*d/dx P(n-1,x) for n >= 1, with P(0,x) = 1.
%t Mathematica
P[0, x_] := 1;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[Together[((1 + (2*n + 2)*x + (6*n - 1)*x^2 + (6*n - 4)*x^3 + (2*n - 2)*x^4)*P[n - 1, x] - (2*x^2 + 6*x^3 + 6*x^4 + 2*x^5)*D[P[n - 1, x], x])/(1 + 2*x + x^2)]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten
%o PARI/GP
P(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 1; for(n = 1, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = ((1 + (2*n + 2)*x + (6*n - 1)*x^2 + (6*n - 4)*x^3 + (2*n - 2)*x^4)*v[i - 1] - (2*x^2 + 6*x^3 + 6*x^4 + 2*x^5)*deriv(v[i - 1], x))/(1 + 2*x + x^2)); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)

Generated with polytool c48629374597.

Proved properties

  • Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in [-1, 0]
    Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.
    by the cited steps: e-cafd3ced03b69579
  • Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 0: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
    All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).
    derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem: e-cafd3ced03b69579
  • Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 0, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
    Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.
    derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem: e-cafd3ced03b69579

Proof chains

1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON

Same fingerprint (1)

Equal up to content, sign, reversal and a small index shift.

References

  1. [LW07] Lily L. Liu and Yi Wang. A unified approach to polynomial sequences with only real zeros. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 38(4):542–560, May 2007. doi:10.1016/j.aam.2006.02.003