A143685: Pascal-(1,9,1) array.
A143685 palindromic γ-positive nonnegative coefficients
Proved for all n: all roots real, in (−∞, 0) · coefficients of one sign · interlacing · Hadamard kernel basis map preserves real roots what this means
Rows ?
| n | x0 | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | Pn(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
| 2 | 1 | 11 | 1 | 13 | |||||
| 3 | 1 | 21 | 21 | 1 | 44 | ||||
| 4 | 1 | 31 | 141 | 31 | 1 | 205 | |||
| 5 | 1 | 41 | 361 | 361 | 41 | 1 | 806 | ||
| 6 | 1 | 51 | 681 | 1991 | 681 | 51 | 1 | 3457 | |
| 7 | 1 | 61 | 1101 | 5921 | 5921 | 1101 | 61 | 1 | 14168 |
Generated b-files: A143685, A143685 (reversed triangle) ?
Computed in your browser ?
Other recurrences
Reversed rows · proved equal for all n (proof step)
Technical details
- Node id
n-7ac21ea1b3b7e282· revision 2 · JSON- Definition source
oeis_catalog:A143685derived:reversal(equal bye-7c807e64c919bec5)- Fingerprint
f6-dcf720ff4b14b926
Observed on the stored rows ?
- Degrees: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 (affine: slope 1, intercept 0)
- Palindromic rows: yes
- γ-positive (gamma_positive): yes
- Nonnegative coefficients (
nonn): yes - Only rational roots (
rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no
OEIS matches ?
- A143685: triangle, 66 terms agree, 11 full rows row-aligned (tabl) OEIS nonn in polytool catalog · view at the OEIS · generated b-file 990 terms from n = 0 ?
- A143685: reversed triangle, 66 terms agree, 11 full rows row-aligned (tabl) OEIS nonn in polytool catalog · view at the OEIS · generated b-file 990 terms from n = 0 ?
- A002534: row sums, 15 terms agree OEIS nonn (row-sum match: finite agreement only) · view at the OEIS
A generated b-file is computed from the node's definition along the row alignment of its OEIS link and starts at the entry's offset. It is an identification on a finite prefix, not a proof that the node and the OEIS entry agree for every n.
OEIS submission text ?
Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula
%F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows.
For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched;
the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a
finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.
The atlas's own rows: n = 0, …, ascending powers of x
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 0: 1; 1: 1, 1; 2: 1, 11, 1; 3: 1, 21, 21, 1; 4: 1, 31, 141, 31, 1; 5: 1, 41, 361, 361, 41, 1; 6: 1, 51, 681, 1991, 681, 51, 1; 7: 1, 61, 1101, 5921, 5921, 1101, 61, 1; 8: 1, 71, 1621, 13151, 29761, 13151, 1621, 71, 1; 9: 1, 81, 2241, 24681, 96201, 96201, 24681, 2241, 81, 1;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy P(n,x) = (1+x)*P(n-1,x) + 9*x*P(n-2,x) for n >= 2, with P(0,x) = 1, P(1,x) = 1 + x.
%t MathematicaP[0, x_] := 1;
P[1, x_] := 1 + x;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[(1 + x)*P[n - 1, x] + 9*x*P[n - 2, x]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 1; v[2] = 1 + x; for(n = 2, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = (1 + x)*v[i - 1] + 9*x*v[i - 2]); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
A143685: triangle, offset 0, from the row P0
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 0: 1; 1: 1, 1; 2: 1, 11, 1; 3: 1, 21, 21, 1; 4: 1, 31, 141, 31, 1; 5: 1, 41, 361, 361, 41, 1; 6: 1, 51, 681, 1991, 681, 51, 1; 7: 1, 61, 1101, 5921, 5921, 1101, 61, 1; 8: 1, 71, 1621, 13151, 29761, 13151, 1621, 71, 1; 9: 1, 81, 2241, 24681, 96201, 96201, 24681, 2241, 81, 1;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy P(n,x) = (1+x)*P(n-1,x) + 9*x*P(n-2,x) for n >= 2, with P(0,x) = 1, P(1,x) = 1 + x.
%t MathematicaP[0, x_] := 1;
P[1, x_] := 1 + x;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[(1 + x)*P[n - 1, x] + 9*x*P[n - 2, x]];
Table[PadRight[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], n + 1], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 1; v[2] = 1 + x; for(n = 2, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = (1 + x)*v[i - 1] + 9*x*v[i - 2]); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c = concat(c, vector(n + 1 - #c)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
A143685: reversed triangle, offset 0, from the row P0
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 0: 1; 1: 1, 1; 2: 1, 11, 1; 3: 1, 21, 21, 1; 4: 1, 31, 141, 31, 1; 5: 1, 41, 361, 361, 41, 1; 6: 1, 51, 681, 1991, 681, 51, 1; 7: 1, 61, 1101, 5921, 5921, 1101, 61, 1; 8: 1, 71, 1621, 13151, 29761, 13151, 1621, 71, 1; 9: 1, 81, 2241, 24681, 96201, 96201, 24681, 2241, 81, 1;
%F FormulaRow n lists the coefficients of P(n,x) in descending powers of x, where P(n,x) = (1+x)*P(n-1,x) + 9*x*P(n-2,x) for n >= 2, with P(0,x) = 1, P(1,x) = 1 + x.
%t MathematicaP[0, x_] := 1;
P[1, x_] := 1 + x;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[(1 + x)*P[n - 1, x] + 9*x*P[n - 2, x]];
Table[Reverse[PadRight[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], n + 1]], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 1; v[2] = 1 + x; for(n = 2, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = (1 + x)*v[i - 1] + 9*x*v[i - 2]); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c = concat(c, vector(n + 1 - #c)); c = Vecrev(c); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
Proved properties
-
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0)
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-f64c8958fa0af494 -
Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 0: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-a327bf7575a1329d,e-f64c8958fa0af494 -
Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 0, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-a327bf7575a1329d,e-f64c8958fa0af494 -
Interlacing of consecutive rows. Rows P_(m-1), P_m interlace (strict, previous interlaces next) for every m >= 1
The roots of consecutive polynomials alternate on the real line.by the cited steps:
e-f64c8958fa0af494 -
Basis map preserves real-rootedness. Basis map u^k -> P_k sends roots in [-9 - sqrt(90), -9 + sqrt(90)] to roots in (-inf, +inf): every real polynomial with all roots in E = [-9 - sqrt(90), -9 + sqrt(90)] has a real-rooted image
The linear map sending x^k to the k-th polynomial of the sequence turns polynomials with roots in one interval into real-rooted ones.by the cited steps:
e-439c4d4974bd964a -
Basis map preserves real-rootedness. Basis map u^k -> P_k sends roots in [-9 - sqrt(90), -9 + sqrt(90)] to roots in [-19 - 2 sqrt(90), -19 + 2 sqrt(90)]: every real polynomial with all roots in E = [-9 - sqrt(90), -9 + sqrt(90)] has an image with all roots in I = [-19 - 2 sqrt(90), -19 + 2 sqrt(90)]
The linear map sending x^k to the k-th polynomial of the sequence turns polynomials with roots in one interval into real-rooted ones.by the cited steps:
e-439c4d4974bd964a -
Basis map preserves real-rootedness. Basis map u^k -> P_k sends roots in [-9 - sqrt(90), 0] to roots in [-19 - 2 sqrt(90), -19 + 2 sqrt(90)]: every PF input with all roots in [-9 - sqrt(90), 0] has a PF image; no larger [-R, 0] works
The linear map sending x^k to the k-th polynomial of the sequence turns polynomials with roots in one interval into real-rooted ones.by the cited steps:
e-439c4d4974bd964a -
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-a327bf7575a1329d
Proof chains
4 incoming proof steps. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON
-
basis_map_theorem
e-439c4d4974bd964aroot: theorem checkAffine-current basis map theorem polytool RealRooted orderTwoConstants_nonneg_iff ?
-
definition_equality
e-7c807e64c919bec5root: theorem checkOre-algebra identity of two definitions polytool ?
-
preserver_image reversal, shift 0
e-a327bf7575a1329dAffine, reversal and Möbius substitutions (elementary) polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
Pascal-(1,9,1) array.
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
theorem_check liu_wang_derivative_lag
e-f64c8958fa0af494root: theorem checkLiu–Wang theorem with a lag row [LW07, Thm 2.1] RealRooted ?
-
-
premise (sequence):
Pascal-(1,9,1) array.
-
↵ theorem_check liu_wang_derivative_lag
e-f64c8958fa0af494(expanded above)
Used in 14 proof steps
e-18b45cb6b1f35030basis_map (A013609) → basis_map_A013609 of Pascal-(1,9,1) array.e-25f308a12acfe6aabasis_map (A008277) → basis_map_A008277 of Pascal-(1,9,1) array.e-30bd6806391058d3basis_map (A013611) → basis_map_A013611 of Pascal-(1,9,1) array.e-a3fef8dca23d39bbbasis_map (A007318) → basis_map_A007318 of Pascal-(1,9,1) array.e-c0f47701ae9fd964basis_map (A013610) → basis_map_A013610 of Pascal-(1,9,1) array.e-22858e6475490a6dgamma_polynomial (scale 1, shift 0) → gamma_polynomial of Pascal-(1,9,1) array.e-36e148c47d980dd4preserver_image (derivative_polynomial, shift 0) → one_plus_derivative of Pascal-(1,9,1) array.e-52a3f4170849e616preserver_image (euler_polynomial, shift 0) → theta_plus_one of Pascal-(1,9,1) array.e-54eec0a056ff5a9dpreserver_image (mobius, shift 0) → mobius_x_over_x_plus_one of Pascal-(1,9,1) array.e-a327bf7575a1329dpreserver_image (reversal, shift 0) → Pascal-(1,9,1) array.e-bfab40bb6e39459cpreserver_image (derivative_polynomial, shift 0) → derivative of Pascal-(1,9,1) array.e-d9851e23928f9acdpreserver_image (affine, shift 0) → basis_map_A007318 of Pascal-(1,9,1) array.e-bcaad38f23069488veronese_section (r=2, j=1, shift 0) → veronese_section_2_1 of Pascal-(1,9,1) array.e-f4445ef5cccc10daveronese_section (r=2, j=0, shift 0) → veronese_section_2_0 of Pascal-(1,9,1) array.
Related sequences ?
No candidate equalities or related sequences.
References
- [LW07] Lily L. Liu and Yi Wang. A unified approach to polynomial sequences with only real zeros. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 38(4):542–560, May 2007. doi:10.1016/j.aam.2006.02.003