A059344 → ⊙ 1/k! (shift -1) → D+1
nonnegative coefficients
Proved for all n: all roots real, in (−∞, 0] · coefficients of one sign · Hadamard kernel what this means
Rows ?
| n | x0 | x1 | x2 | x3 | Pn(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3 | 3 | 2 | 5 | ||
| 4 | 7 | 6 | 13 | ||
| 5 | 13 | 24 | 6 | 43 | |
| 6 | 21 | 80 | 30 | 131 | |
| 7 | 31 | 210 | 150 | 20 | 411 |
| 8 | 43 | 462 | 630 | 140 | 1275 |
Generated b-files: A391990 (row sums) ?
Computed in your browser ?
Technical details
- Node id
n-f88ecd1d5f2ce358· revision 1 · JSON- Definition source
derived:one_plus_derivative- Fingerprint
f6-4806a24fb0d130c1
Observed on the stored rows ?
- Degrees: 0, 0, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5, 5, 6, 6, 7 (half affine: slope 1, intercept -1)
- Palindromic rows: no
- γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
- Nonnegative coefficients (
nonn): yes - Only rational roots (
rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no
OEIS matches ?
- A391990: row sums, 15 terms agree OEIS nonn (row-sum match: finite agreement only) · view at the OEIS · generated b-file 200 terms from n = 0 ?
A generated b-file is computed from the node's definition along the row alignment of its OEIS link and starts at the entry's offset. It is an identification on a finite prefix, not a proof that the node and the OEIS entry agree for every n.
OEIS submission text ?
Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula
%F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows.
For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched;
the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a
finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.
The atlas's own rows: n = 1, …, ascending powers of x
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 1: 1; 2: 1; 3: 3, 2; 4: 7, 6; 5: 13, 24, 6; 6: 21, 80, 30; 7: 31, 210, 150, 20; 8: 43, 462, 630, 140; 9: 57, 896, 2100, 840, 70; 10: 73, 1584, 5796, 4200, 630;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy (n^3-6*n^2+12*n-7+(4*n^2-19*n+15)*x+(4*n-4)*x^2)*P(n,x) = (n^3-4*n^2+6*n-3+(4*n^3-24*n^2+37*n-17)*x+(16*n^2-72*n+84)*x^2+(16*n-32)*x^3)*P(n-1,x) + ((2*n^2-6*n+4)*x-(8*n^2-32*n+30)*x^2-(32*n-64)*x^3-32*x^4)*d/dx P(n-1,x) for n >= 2, with P(1,x) = 1.
%t MathematicaP[1, x_] := 1;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[Together[((n^3 - 4*n^2 + 6*n - 3 + (4*n^3 - 24*n^2 + 37*n - 17)*x + (16*n^2 - 72*n + 84)*x^2 + (16*n - 32)*x^3)*P[n - 1, x] + ((2*n^2 - 6*n + 4)*x - (8*n^2 - 32*n + 30)*x^2 - (32*n - 64)*x^3 - 32*x^4)*D[P[n - 1, x], x])/(n^3 - 6*n^2 + 12*n - 7 + (4*n^2 - 19*n + 15)*x + (4*n - 4)*x^2)]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 1, 10}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N)); v[1] = 1; for(n = 2, N, my(i = n); v[i] = ((n^3 - 4*n^2 + 6*n - 3 + (4*n^3 - 24*n^2 + 37*n - 17)*x + (16*n^2 - 72*n + 84)*x^2 + (16*n - 32)*x^3)*v[i - 1] + ((2*n^2 - 6*n + 4)*x - (8*n^2 - 32*n + 30)*x^2 - (32*n - 64)*x^3 - 32*x^4)*deriv(v[i - 1], x))/(n^3 - 6*n^2 + 12*n - 7 + (4*n^2 - 19*n + 15)*x + (4*n - 4)*x^2)); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i, v[i])))};
T(10)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
Proved properties
-
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 1, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-272eb8130991447b -
Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 1: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-272eb8130991447b -
Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 1, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-272eb8130991447b
Proof chains
1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON
-
preserver_image derivative_polynomial, shift 0
e-272eb8130991447bLaguerre’s theorem on differential operators [SP14] polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
T(n,k) = binomial(n,2*k)*binomial(2*k,k) for 0 <= k <= n, triangle read by rows.
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 1, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
preserver_image hadamard_multiplier, shift -1
e-4d3032ecd7423900Pólya–Schur theorem on multiplier sequences [SP14; Bra15, Thm 40] polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle read by rows: row n consists of the nonzero coefficients of the expansion of 2^n x^n in terms of Hermite polyn…
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
parent_provers paper_theorem
e-94e95c2ea0369f05root: theorem checkParent-row provers of polytool polytool ?
-
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle read by rows: row n consists of the nonzero coefficients of the expansion of 2^n x^n in terms of Hermite polyn…
-
-
premise (sequence):
T(n,k) = binomial(n,2*k)*binomial(2*k,k) for 0 <= k <= n, triangle read by rows.
Related sequences ?
Same fingerprint (1)
Equal up to content, sign, reversal and a small index shift.
References
- [Bra15] Petter Brändén. Unimodality, log-concavity, real-rootedness and beyond. Handbook of enumerative combinatorics, :437–483, March 2015. doi:10.1201/b18255-10
- [SP14] J Schur and G Polya. Über zwei Arten von Faktorenfolgen in der Theorie der algebraischen Gleichungen. J. Reine Angew. Math., 1914.