A105793: Expansion of e.g.f. (1 + y)^(1 + x).
A028338 → x ↦ −2x−3
A105793 only rational roots
Proved for all n: all roots real, in [−3/2, ∞) · interlacing (weak) what this means
Rows ?
| n | x0 | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | Pn(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
| 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||||
| 4 | 0 | 2 | -1 | -2 | 1 | 0 | |||
| 5 | 0 | -6 | 5 | 5 | -5 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 6 | 0 | 24 | -26 | -15 | 25 | -9 | 1 | 0 | |
| 7 | 0 | -120 | 154 | 49 | -140 | 70 | -14 | 1 | 0 |
Generated b-files: A105793 ?
Computed in your browser ?
Technical details
- Node id
n-ebe1ce47fcd8575c· revision 1 · JSON- Definition source
oeis_catalog:A105793- Fingerprint
f6-f072b8c7a5a24af8
Observed on the stored rows ?
- Degrees: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 (affine: slope 1, intercept 0)
- Palindromic rows: no
- γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
- Nonnegative coefficients (
nonn): no - Only rational roots (
rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): yes
OEIS matches ?
- A180215: row sums, 15 terms agree OEIS nonn (row-sum match: finite agreement only) · view at the OEIS
- A105793: triangle, 66 terms agree, 11 full rows row-aligned (tabl) in polytool catalog · view at the OEIS · generated b-file 990 terms from n = 0 ?
A generated b-file is computed from the node's definition along the row alignment of its OEIS link and starts at the entry's offset. It is an identification on a finite prefix, not a proof that the node and the OEIS entry agree for every n.
OEIS submission text ?
Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula
%F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows.
For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched;
the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a
finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.
The atlas's own rows: n = 0, …, ascending powers of x
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 0: 1; 1: 1, 1; 2: 0, 1, 1; 3: 0, -1, 0, 1; 4: 0, 2, -1, -2, 1; 5: 0, -6, 5, 5, -5, 1; 6: 0, 24, -26, -15, 25, -9, 1; 7: 0, -120, 154, 49, -140, 70, -14, 1; 8: 0, 720, -1044, -140, 889, -560, 154, -20, 1; 9: 0, -5040, 8028, -64, -6363, 4809, -1638, 294, -27, 1;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy P(n,x) = -(n-2-x)*P(n-1,x) for n >= 1, with P(0,x) = 1.
%t MathematicaP[0, x_] := 1;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[-(n - 2 - x)*P[n - 1, x]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 1; for(n = 1, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = -(n - 2 - x)*v[i - 1]); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
A105793: triangle, offset 0, from the row P0
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 0: 1; 1: 1, 1; 2: 0, 1, 1; 3: 0, -1, 0, 1; 4: 0, 2, -1, -2, 1; 5: 0, -6, 5, 5, -5, 1; 6: 0, 24, -26, -15, 25, -9, 1; 7: 0, -120, 154, 49, -140, 70, -14, 1; 8: 0, 720, -1044, -140, 889, -560, 154, -20, 1; 9: 0, -5040, 8028, -64, -6363, 4809, -1638, 294, -27, 1;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy P(n,x) = -(n-2-x)*P(n-1,x) for n >= 1, with P(0,x) = 1.
%t MathematicaP[0, x_] := 1;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[-(n - 2 - x)*P[n - 1, x]];
Table[PadRight[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], n + 1], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 1; for(n = 1, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = -(n - 2 - x)*v[i - 1]); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c = concat(c, vector(n + 1 - #c)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
Proved properties
-
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in [-3/2, +inf)
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-6cd09736036c3bec -
Interlacing of consecutive rows. Rows P_(m-1), P_m interlace (weak, unordered) for every m >= 1
The roots of consecutive polynomials alternate on the real line.by the cited steps:
e-6cd09736036c3bec
Proof chains
1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON
-
preserver_image affine, shift 0
e-6cd09736036c3becAffine, reversal and Möbius substitutions (elementary) polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle of coefficients in expansion of (x+1)*(x+3)*...*(x + 2n - 1) in rising powers of x.
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
theorem_check liu_wang
e-59b849691f316c6froot: theorem checkLiu–Wang theorem [LW07, Thm 2.1, Cor 2.4] ?
-
parent_provers root_domain
e-ef36674c01230a86root: theorem checkParent-row provers of polytool polytool ?
-
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle of coefficients in expansion of (x+1)*(x+3)*...*(x + 2n - 1) in rising powers of x.
Used in 2 proof steps
e-167ee17f7f3ebd58obreschkoff_combination → obreschkoff_combination of Expansion of e.g.f. (1 + y)^(1 + x).e-167ee17f7f3ebd58obreschkoff_combination → obreschkoff_combination of Expansion of e.g.f. (1 + y)^(1 + x).
Related sequences ?
No candidate equalities or related sequences.
References
- [LW07] Lily L. Liu and Yi Wang. A unified approach to polynomial sequences with only real zeros. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 38(4):542–560, May 2007. doi:10.1016/j.aam.2006.02.003