A103327 → x ↦ x/(x+1)

nonnegative coefficients

Proved for all n: all roots real, in [−1, 0] · coefficients of one sign · Hadamard kernel what this means

Recurrence
\(\left(-1 - 2\,x - x^{2} + 2\,n + 4\,n x + 2\,n x^{2}\right)\,P_{n}(x) = \left(1 + 2\,x + x^{2} + 2\,n + 8\,n x + 10\,n x^{2} + 4\,n x^{3}\right)\,P_{n-1}(x) + \left(4\,x + 12\,x^{2} + 12\,x^{3} + 4\,x^{4}\right)\,P_{n-1}'(x)\)
\(P_{0}(x) = 1\)

Rows ?

nx0x1x2x3x4x5x6x7Pn(1)
011
1347
25201641
375611264239
491204325762561393
51122012322816281610248119
613364291299841664013312409647321
71556060482880070400921606144016384275807

Generated b-files: A002315 (row sums) ?

Computed in your browser ?

Technical details
Node id
n-dba7109e1fb1496f · revision 1 · JSON
Definition source
derived:mobius_x_over_x_plus_one
Fingerprint
f6-3f225bab20c1f22f

Observed on the stored rows ?

  • Degrees: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 (affine: slope 1, intercept 0)
  • Palindromic rows: no
  • γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
  • Nonnegative coefficients (nonn): yes
  • Only rational roots (rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no

OEIS matches ?

A generated b-file is computed from the node's definition along the row alignment of its OEIS link and starts at the entry's offset. It is an identification on a finite prefix, not a proof that the node and the OEIS entry agree for every n.

OEIS submission text ?

Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula %F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows. For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched; the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.

The atlas's own rows: n = 0, …, ascending powers of x
%e Example
Triangle begins:
  0:  1;
  1:  3,    4;
  2:  5,   20,    16;
  3:  7,   56,   112,     64;
  4:  9,  120,   432,    576,    256;
  5: 11,  220,  1232,   2816,   2816,    1024;
  6: 13,  364,  2912,   9984,  16640,   13312,    4096;
  7: 15,  560,  6048,  28800,  70400,   92160,   61440,   16384;
  8: 17,  816, 11424,  71808, 239360,  452608,  487424,  278528,   65536;
  9: 19, 1140, 20064, 160512, 695552, 1770496, 2723840, 2490368, 1245184, 262144;
%F Formula
The row polynomials satisfy (2*n-1+(4*n-2)*x+(2*n-1)*x^2)*P(n,x) = (2*n+1+(8*n+2)*x+(10*n+1)*x^2+4*n*x^3)*P(n-1,x) + (4*x+12*x^2+12*x^3+4*x^4)*d/dx P(n-1,x) for n >= 1, with P(0,x) = 1.
%t Mathematica
P[0, x_] := 1;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[Together[((2*n + 1 + (8*n + 2)*x + (10*n + 1)*x^2 + 4*n*x^3)*P[n - 1, x] + (4*x + 12*x^2 + 12*x^3 + 4*x^4)*D[P[n - 1, x], x])/(2*n - 1 + (4*n - 2)*x + (2*n - 1)*x^2)]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten
%o PARI/GP
P(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 1; for(n = 1, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = ((2*n + 1 + (8*n + 2)*x + (10*n + 1)*x^2 + 4*n*x^3)*v[i - 1] + (4*x + 12*x^2 + 12*x^3 + 4*x^4)*deriv(v[i - 1], x))/(2*n - 1 + (4*n - 2)*x + (2*n - 1)*x^2)); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)

Generated with polytool c48629374597.

Proved properties

  • Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in [-1, 0]
    Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.
    by the cited steps: e-4284798cd864599a
  • Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 0: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
    All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).
    derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem: e-4284798cd864599a
  • Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 0, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
    Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.
    derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem: e-4284798cd864599a

Proof chains

1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON

Same fingerprint (1)

Equal up to content, sign, reversal and a small index shift.

References

  1. [Fav35] Jean Favard. Sur les polynômes de tchebicheff. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 200:2052–2053, 1935.
  2. [Sze39] G. Szegő. Orthogonal Polynomials. Colloquium publications, American Mathematical Society, 1939. doi:10.1090/coll/023