A008292 → γ (scale 1/4) (shift +1) → D
nonnegative coefficients
Proved for all n: all roots real, in (−∞, 0] · coefficients of one sign · Hadamard kernel what this means
Rows ?
| n | x0 | x1 | x2 | Pn(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | |||
| 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| 3 | 16 | 16 | ||
| 4 | 88 | 32 | 120 | |
| 5 | 416 | 544 | 960 | |
| 6 | 1824 | 5760 | 816 | 8400 |
| 7 | 7680 | 49152 | 23808 | 80640 |
Generated b-files: A090672 (row sums) ?
Computed in your browser ?
Technical details
- Node id
n-db03f4043335d472· revision 1 · JSON- Definition source
derived:derivative- Fingerprint
f6-044c7700ca6fa40f
Observed on the stored rows ?
- Degrees: -1, -1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5, 5, 6 (half affine: slope 1, intercept -2)
- Palindromic rows: no
- γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
- Nonnegative coefficients (
nonn): yes - Only rational roots (
rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no
OEIS matches ?
- A090672: row sums, 14 terms agree OEIS nonn (row-sum match: finite agreement only) · view at the OEIS · generated b-file 200 terms from n = 1 ?
A generated b-file is computed from the node's definition along the row alignment of its OEIS link and starts at the entry's offset. It is an identification on a finite prefix, not a proof that the node and the OEIS entry agree for every n.
OEIS submission text ?
Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula
%F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows.
For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched;
the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a
finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.
The atlas's own rows: n = 0, …, ascending powers of x
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 0: 0; 1: 0; 2: 2; 3: 16; 4: 88, 32; 5: 416, 544; 6: 1824, 5760, 816; 7: 7680, 49152, 23808; 8: 31616, 371712, 411648, 31744; 9: 128512, 2609664, 5523456, 1415168;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy (n-2)*P(n,x) = -(8*n-8+(4*n^2-20*n+16)*x+(n^3-7*n^2+14*n-8)*x^2)*P(n-2,x) - ((4*n-4)*x+(2*n^2-10*n+8)*x^2-(2*n^2-6*n+4)*x^3)*d/dx P(n-2,x) + (6*n-10+(2*n^2-10*n+12)*x)*P(n-1,x) + ((2*n-4)*x-(2*n-4)*x^2)*d/dx P(n-1,x) for n >= 3, with P(0,x) = 0, P(1,x) = 0, P(2,x) = 2.
%t MathematicaP[0, x_] := 0;
P[1, x_] := 0;
P[2, x_] := 2;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[Together[(-(8*n - 8 + (4*n^2 - 20*n + 16)*x + (n^3 - 7*n^2 + 14*n - 8)*x^2)*P[n - 2, x] - ((4*n - 4)*x + (2*n^2 - 10*n + 8)*x^2 - (2*n^2 - 6*n + 4)*x^3)*D[P[n - 2, x], x] + (6*n - 10 + (2*n^2 - 10*n + 12)*x)*P[n - 1, x] + ((2*n - 4)*x - (2*n - 4)*x^2)*D[P[n - 1, x], x])/(n - 2)]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 0; v[2] = 0; v[3] = 2; for(n = 3, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = (-(8*n - 8 + (4*n^2 - 20*n + 16)*x + (n^3 - 7*n^2 + 14*n - 8)*x^2)*v[i - 2] - ((4*n - 4)*x + (2*n^2 - 10*n + 8)*x^2 - (2*n^2 - 6*n + 4)*x^3)*deriv(v[i - 2], x) + (6*n - 10 + (2*n^2 - 10*n + 12)*x)*v[i - 1] + ((2*n - 4)*x - (2*n - 4)*x^2)*deriv(v[i - 1], x))/(n - 2)); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
Proved properties
-
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-4f4a07a2cead1a74 -
Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 0: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-4f4a07a2cead1a74 -
Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 0, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-4f4a07a2cead1a74
Proof chains
1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON
-
preserver_image derivative_polynomial, shift 0
e-4f4a07a2cead1a74Laguerre’s theorem on differential operators [SP14] polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle read by rows: T(n,k) (n >= 1, 0 <= k <= ceiling(n/2)-1) = number of permutations of [n] with k peaks.
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
gamma_polynomial scale 1/4, shift 1
e-00ceaf3777abe095Gamma criterion RealRooted IsGammaExpansion.isRealRooted_and_hasRootsNonpos_iff ?
-
premise (sequence):
eulerian
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 1, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
theorem_check liu_wang
e-ab3cdcfae289b48droot: theorem checkLiu–Wang theorem [LW07, Thm 2.1, Cor 2.4] ?
-
parent_provers root_domain
e-6c46c948823f0a8croot: theorem checkParent-row provers of polytool polytool ?
-
preserver_image reversal, shift 0
e-c61ecf4ef1c45372Affine, reversal and Möbius substitutions (elementary) polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
eulerian
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 1, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
premise (sequence):
eulerian
-
-
premise (sequence):
eulerian
-
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle read by rows: T(n,k) (n >= 1, 0 <= k <= ceiling(n/2)-1) = number of permutations of [n] with k peaks.
Related sequences ?
Same fingerprint (1)
Equal up to content, sign, reversal and a small index shift.
References
- [LW07] Lily L. Liu and Yi Wang. A unified approach to polynomial sequences with only real zeros. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 38(4):542–560, May 2007. doi:10.1016/j.aam.2006.02.003
- [SP14] J Schur and G Polya. Über zwei Arten von Faktorenfolgen in der Theorie der algebraischen Gleichungen. J. Reine Angew. Math., 1914.