A039756 → θ+1
nonnegative coefficients
Proved for all n: all roots real, in (−∞, 0] · coefficients of one sign · interlacing (weak) · Hadamard kernel what this means
Rows ?
| n | x0 | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | Pn(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||||
| 2 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 12 | |||||
| 3 | 1 | 18 | 39 | 4 | 62 | ||||
| 4 | 1 | 32 | 174 | 160 | 5 | 372 | |||
| 5 | 1 | 50 | 510 | 1320 | 605 | 6 | 2492 | ||
| 6 | 1 | 72 | 1185 | 6080 | 8855 | 2184 | 7 | 18384 | |
| 7 | 1 | 98 | 2373 | 20300 | 62055 | 55314 | 7651 | 8 | 147800 |
Computed in your browser ?
Technical details
- Node id
n-d28f63ae20e4d8dc· revision 1 · JSON- Definition source
derived:theta_plus_one- Fingerprint
f6-1ea903b913797f87
Observed on the stored rows ?
- Degrees: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 (affine: slope 1, intercept 0)
- Palindromic rows: no
- γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
- Nonnegative coefficients (
nonn): yes - Only rational roots (
rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no
OEIS matches ?
No OEIS matches.
OEIS submission text ?
Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula
%F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows.
For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched;
the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a
finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.
The atlas's own rows: n = 0, …, ascending powers of x
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 0: 1; 1: 1, 2; 2: 1, 8, 3; 3: 1, 18, 39, 4; 4: 1, 32, 174, 160, 5; 5: 1, 50, 510, 1320, 605, 6; 6: 1, 72, 1185, 6080, 8855, 2184, 7; 7: 1, 98, 2373, 20300, 62055, 55314, 7651, 8; 8: 1, 128, 4284, 55104, 290430, 576576, 330316, 26240, 9; 9: 1, 162, 7164, 129360, 1048110, 3713220, 5039020, 1913760, 88569, 10;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy (2*n-1)*P(n,x) = -(2*n+1+(8*n^2-8*n-6)*x+(8*n^3-12*n^2-2*n+3)*x^2)*P(n-2,x) + ((4*n+2)*x^2+(8*n^2-2)*x^3)*d/dx P(n-2,x) + (4*n+(8*n^2-8*n+2)*x)*P(n-1,x) - (4*n-2)*x^2*d/dx P(n-1,x) for n >= 2, with P(0,x) = 1, P(1,x) = 1 + 2*x.
%t MathematicaP[0, x_] := 1;
P[1, x_] := 1 + 2*x;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[Together[(-(2*n + 1 + (8*n^2 - 8*n - 6)*x + (8*n^3 - 12*n^2 - 2*n + 3)*x^2)*P[n - 2, x] + ((4*n + 2)*x^2 + (8*n^2 - 2)*x^3)*D[P[n - 2, x], x] + (4*n + (8*n^2 - 8*n + 2)*x)*P[n - 1, x] - (4*n - 2)*x^2*D[P[n - 1, x], x])/(2*n - 1)]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 1; v[2] = 1 + 2*x; for(n = 2, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = (-(2*n + 1 + (8*n^2 - 8*n - 6)*x + (8*n^3 - 12*n^2 - 2*n + 3)*x^2)*v[i - 2] + ((4*n + 2)*x^2 + (8*n^2 - 2)*x^3)*deriv(v[i - 2], x) + (4*n + (8*n^2 - 8*n + 2)*x)*v[i - 1] - (4*n - 2)*x^2*deriv(v[i - 1], x))/(2*n - 1)); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
Proved properties
-
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-f30f22ad14f353b2 -
Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 0: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-f30f22ad14f353b2 -
Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 0, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-f30f22ad14f353b2 -
Interlacing of consecutive rows. Rows P_(m-1), P_m interlace (weak, unordered) for every m >= 1
The roots of consecutive polynomials alternate on the real line.by the cited steps:
e-f30f22ad14f353b2
Proof chains
1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON
-
preserver_image euler_polynomial, shift 0
e-f30f22ad14f353b2Laguerre’s theorem on multiplier sequences [SP14; Bra15, Thm 40] polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle of B-analogs of Stirling numbers of 2nd kind.
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
theorem_check liu_wang
e-7519e7535554cb98root: theorem checkLiu–Wang theorem [LW07, Thm 2.1, Cor 2.4] ?
-
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle of B-analogs of Stirling numbers of 2nd kind.
Related sequences ?
No candidate equalities or related sequences.
References
- [Bra15] Petter Brändén. Unimodality, log-concavity, real-rootedness and beyond. Handbook of enumerative combinatorics, :437–483, March 2015. doi:10.1201/b18255-10
- [LW07] Lily L. Liu and Yi Wang. A unified approach to polynomial sequences with only real zeros. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 38(4):542–560, May 2007. doi:10.1016/j.aam.2006.02.003
- [SP14] J Schur and G Polya. Über zwei Arten von Faktorenfolgen in der Theorie der algebraischen Gleichungen. J. Reine Angew. Math., 1914.