A102365 → θ+1
nonnegative coefficients
Proved for all n: all roots real, in (−∞, 0] · coefficients of one sign · interlacing (weak) · Hadamard kernel what this means
Rows ?
| n | x0 | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | Pn(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||||
| 3 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 14 | ||||
| 4 | 1 | 36 | 45 | 4 | 86 | |||
| 5 | 1 | 116 | 387 | 148 | 5 | 657 | ||
| 6 | 1 | 358 | 2631 | 2584 | 415 | 6 | 5995 | |
| 7 | 1 | 1086 | 15840 | 32120 | 13425 | 1062 | 7 | 63541 |
Computed in your browser ?
Technical details
- Node id
n-ce30cad803145faa· revision 1 · JSON- Definition source
derived:theta_plus_one- Fingerprint
f6-74199812e346d89c
Observed on the stored rows ?
- Degrees: 0, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 (irregular)
- Palindromic rows: no
- γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
- Nonnegative coefficients (
nonn): yes - Only rational roots (
rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no
OEIS matches ?
No OEIS matches.
OEIS submission text ?
Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula
%F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows.
For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched;
the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a
finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.
The atlas's own rows: n = 0, …, ascending powers of x
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 0: 1; 1: 1; 2: 1, 2; 3: 1, 10, 3; 4: 1, 36, 45, 4; 5: 1, 116, 387, 148, 5; 6: 1, 358, 2631, 2584, 415, 6; 7: 1, 1086, 15840, 32120, 13425, 1062, 7; 8: 1, 3272, 88974, 330440, 281425, 60012, 2569, 8; 9: 1, 9832, 479226, 3024872, 4598075, 2010972, 243439, 5992, 9;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy (n-1)*P(n,x) = (n+(2*n^2-4*n)*x-(n^3-3*n^2+2*n)*x^2)*P(n-2,x) + (2*n*x-(2*n^2-n)*x^2+(n^2-n)*x^3)*d/dx P(n-2,x) - (1-(2*n^2-4*n+2)*x)*P(n-1,x) + ((2*n-2)*x-(n-1)*x^2)*d/dx P(n-1,x) for n >= 2, with P(0,x) = 1, P(1,x) = 1.
%t MathematicaP[0, x_] := 1;
P[1, x_] := 1;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[Together[((n + (2*n^2 - 4*n)*x - (n^3 - 3*n^2 + 2*n)*x^2)*P[n - 2, x] + (2*n*x - (2*n^2 - n)*x^2 + (n^2 - n)*x^3)*D[P[n - 2, x], x] - (1 - (2*n^2 - 4*n + 2)*x)*P[n - 1, x] + ((2*n - 2)*x - (n - 1)*x^2)*D[P[n - 1, x], x])/(n - 1)]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 1; v[2] = 1; for(n = 2, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = ((n + (2*n^2 - 4*n)*x - (n^3 - 3*n^2 + 2*n)*x^2)*v[i - 2] + (2*n*x - (2*n^2 - n)*x^2 + (n^2 - n)*x^3)*deriv(v[i - 2], x) - (1 - (2*n^2 - 4*n + 2)*x)*v[i - 1] + ((2*n - 2)*x - (n - 1)*x^2)*deriv(v[i - 1], x))/(n - 1)); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
Proved properties
-
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-5503999bc1e6bd41 -
Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 0: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-5503999bc1e6bd41 -
Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 0, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-5503999bc1e6bd41 -
Interlacing of consecutive rows. Rows P_(m-1), P_m interlace (weak, unordered) for every m >= 1
The roots of consecutive polynomials alternate on the real line.by the cited steps:
e-5503999bc1e6bd41
Proof chains
1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON
-
preserver_image euler_polynomial, shift 0
e-5503999bc1e6bd41Laguerre’s theorem on multiplier sequences [SP14; Bra15, Thm 40] polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle T(n,k), 0 <= k <= n, read by rows: given by [ 1, 0, 3, 0, 5, 0, 7, 0, 9, 0, ...] DELTA [ 0, 1, 0, 2, 0, 3, 0, …
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
theorem_check liu_wang
e-1ce099339e80292croot: theorem checkLiu–Wang theorem [LW07, Thm 2.1, Cor 2.4] ?
-
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle T(n,k), 0 <= k <= n, read by rows: given by [ 1, 0, 3, 0, 5, 0, 7, 0, 9, 0, ...] DELTA [ 0, 1, 0, 2, 0, 3, 0, …
Related sequences ?
No candidate equalities or related sequences.
References
- [Bra15] Petter Brändén. Unimodality, log-concavity, real-rootedness and beyond. Handbook of enumerative combinatorics, :437–483, March 2015. doi:10.1201/b18255-10
- [LW07] Lily L. Liu and Yi Wang. A unified approach to polynomial sequences with only real zeros. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 38(4):542–560, May 2007. doi:10.1016/j.aam.2006.02.003
- [SP14] J Schur and G Polya. Über zwei Arten von Faktorenfolgen in der Theorie der algebraischen Gleichungen. J. Reine Angew. Math., 1914.