A106800 → D
nonnegative coefficients
Proved for all n: all roots real, in (−∞, 0] · coefficients of one sign · interlacing (weak) · Hadamard kernel what this means
Rows ?
| n | x0 | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | Pn(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | ||||||
| 2 | 0 | ||||||
| 3 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 5 | ||||
| 5 | 6 | 14 | 3 | 23 | |||
| 6 | 10 | 50 | 45 | 4 | 109 | ||
| 7 | 15 | 130 | 270 | 124 | 5 | 544 | |
| 8 | 21 | 280 | 1050 | 1204 | 315 | 6 | 2876 |
Generated b-files: A278677 (row sums) ?
Computed in your browser ?
Technical details
- Node id
n-bb621e5a7fb6b6af· revision 1 · JSON- Definition source
derived:derivative- Fingerprint
f6-f041ba2901346a21
Observed on the stored rows ?
- Degrees: -1, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 (affine: slope 1, intercept -3)
- Palindromic rows: no
- γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
- Nonnegative coefficients (
nonn): yes - Only rational roots (
rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no
OEIS matches ?
- A278677: row sums, 13 terms agree OEIS nonn (row-sum match: finite agreement only) · view at the OEIS · generated b-file 200 terms from n = 0 ?
A generated b-file is computed from the node's definition along the row alignment of its OEIS link and starts at the entry's offset. It is an identification on a finite prefix, not a proof that the node and the OEIS entry agree for every n.
OEIS submission text ?
Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula
%F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows.
For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched;
the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a
finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.
The atlas's own rows: n = 1, …, ascending powers of x
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 1: 0; 2: 0; 3: 1; 4: 3, 2; 5: 6, 14, 3; 6: 10, 50, 45, 4; 7: 15, 130, 270, 124, 5; 8: 21, 280, 1050, 1204, 315, 6; 9: 28, 532, 3150, 6804, 4830, 762, 7; 10: 36, 924, 7938, 27804, 38850, 18150, 1785, 8;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy (n-3)*P(n,x) = -(n-2+(2*n^2-12*n+16)*x+(n^3-9*n^2+26*n-24)*x^2)*P(n-2,x) + ((n-2)*x^2+(n^2-5*n+6)*x^3)*d/dx P(n-2,x) + (2*n-5+(2*n^2-12*n+18)*x)*P(n-1,x) - (n-3)*x^2*d/dx P(n-1,x) for n >= 4, with P(1,x) = 0, P(2,x) = 0, P(3,x) = 1.
%t MathematicaP[1, x_] := 0;
P[2, x_] := 0;
P[3, x_] := 1;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[Together[(-(n - 2 + (2*n^2 - 12*n + 16)*x + (n^3 - 9*n^2 + 26*n - 24)*x^2)*P[n - 2, x] + ((n - 2)*x^2 + (n^2 - 5*n + 6)*x^3)*D[P[n - 2, x], x] + (2*n - 5 + (2*n^2 - 12*n + 18)*x)*P[n - 1, x] - (n - 3)*x^2*D[P[n - 1, x], x])/(n - 3)]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 1, 10}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N)); v[1] = 0; v[2] = 0; v[3] = 1; for(n = 4, N, my(i = n); v[i] = (-(n - 2 + (2*n^2 - 12*n + 16)*x + (n^3 - 9*n^2 + 26*n - 24)*x^2)*v[i - 2] + ((n - 2)*x^2 + (n^2 - 5*n + 6)*x^3)*deriv(v[i - 2], x) + (2*n - 5 + (2*n^2 - 12*n + 18)*x)*v[i - 1] - (n - 3)*x^2*deriv(v[i - 1], x))/(n - 3)); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i, v[i])))};
T(10)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
Proved properties
-
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 1, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-4dce43a45fb5789a -
Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 1: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-4dce43a45fb5789a -
Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 1, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-4dce43a45fb5789a -
Interlacing of consecutive rows. Rows P_(m-1), P_m interlace (weak, unordered) for every m >= 2
The roots of consecutive polynomials alternate on the real line.by the cited steps:
e-4dce43a45fb5789a
Proof chains
1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON
-
preserver_image derivative_polynomial, shift 0
e-4dce43a45fb5789aLaguerre’s theorem on differential operators [SP14] polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle of Stirling numbers of 2nd kind, S(n, n-k), n >= 0, 0 <= k <= n.
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 1, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
theorem_check liu_wang
e-2ab1dfe057e84c9droot: theorem checkLiu–Wang theorem [LW07, Thm 2.1, Cor 2.4] ?
-
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle of Stirling numbers of 2nd kind, S(n, n-k), n >= 0, 0 <= k <= n.
Related sequences ?
Same fingerprint (1)
Equal up to content, sign, reversal and a small index shift.
References
- [LW07] Lily L. Liu and Yi Wang. A unified approach to polynomial sequences with only real zeros. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 38(4):542–560, May 2007. doi:10.1016/j.aam.2006.02.003
- [SP14] J Schur and G Polya. Über zwei Arten von Faktorenfolgen in der Theorie der algebraischen Gleichungen. J. Reine Angew. Math., 1914.