A086645 → θ+1
nonnegative coefficients
Proved for all n: all roots real, in (−∞, 0] · coefficients of one sign · interlacing (weak) · Hadamard kernel what this means
Rows ?
| n | x0 | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | Pn(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||||
| 3 | 1 | 12 | 3 | 16 | |||||
| 4 | 1 | 30 | 45 | 4 | 80 | ||||
| 5 | 1 | 56 | 210 | 112 | 5 | 384 | |||
| 6 | 1 | 90 | 630 | 840 | 225 | 6 | 1792 | ||
| 7 | 1 | 132 | 1485 | 3696 | 2475 | 396 | 7 | 8192 | |
| 8 | 1 | 182 | 3003 | 12012 | 15015 | 6006 | 637 | 8 | 36864 |
Computed in your browser ?
Technical details
- Node id
n-b7536fd26109db74· revision 1 · JSON- Definition source
derived:theta_plus_one- Fingerprint
f6-5953f24a720dd506
Observed on the stored rows ?
- Degrees: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 (affine: slope 1, intercept -1)
- Palindromic rows: no
- γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
- Nonnegative coefficients (
nonn): yes - Only rational roots (
rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no
OEIS matches ?
No OEIS matches.
OEIS submission text ?
Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula
%F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows.
For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched;
the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a
finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.
The atlas's own rows: n = 1, …, ascending powers of x
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 1: 1; 2: 1, 2; 3: 1, 12, 3; 4: 1, 30, 45, 4; 5: 1, 56, 210, 112, 5; 6: 1, 90, 630, 840, 225, 6; 7: 1, 132, 1485, 3696, 2475, 396, 7; 8: 1, 182, 3003, 12012, 15015, 6006, 637, 8; 9: 1, 240, 5460, 32032, 64350, 48048, 12740, 960, 9; 10: 1, 306, 9180, 74256, 218790, 262548, 129948, 24480, 1377, 10;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy -(3*n-6-(2*n^3-9*n^2+13*n-6)*x)*P(n,x) = -(3*n-6-(2*n^3-9*n^2-5*n+30)*x-(6*n^3-19*n^2+12*n+4)*x^2)*P(n-1,x) - (6*x-(4*n^2-4*n+4)*x^2+(4*n^2-4*n-2)*x^3)*d/dx P(n-1,x) for n >= 3, with P(1,x) = 1, P(2,x) = 1 + 2*x.
%t MathematicaP[1, x_] := 1;
P[2, x_] := 1 + 2*x;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[Together[(-(3*n - 6 - (2*n^3 - 9*n^2 - 5*n + 30)*x - (6*n^3 - 19*n^2 + 12*n + 4)*x^2)*P[n - 1, x] - (6*x - (4*n^2 - 4*n + 4)*x^2 + (4*n^2 - 4*n - 2)*x^3)*D[P[n - 1, x], x])/(-3*n + 6 + (2*n^3 - 9*n^2 + 13*n - 6)*x)]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 1, 10}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N)); v[1] = 1; v[2] = 1 + 2*x; for(n = 3, N, my(i = n); v[i] = (-(3*n - 6 - (2*n^3 - 9*n^2 - 5*n + 30)*x - (6*n^3 - 19*n^2 + 12*n + 4)*x^2)*v[i - 1] - (6*x - (4*n^2 - 4*n + 4)*x^2 + (4*n^2 - 4*n - 2)*x^3)*deriv(v[i - 1], x))/(-3*n + 6 + (2*n^3 - 9*n^2 + 13*n - 6)*x)); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i, v[i])))};
T(10)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
Proved properties
-
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 1, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-731bf5f7395212d6 -
Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 1: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-731bf5f7395212d6 -
Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 1, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-731bf5f7395212d6 -
Interlacing of consecutive rows. Rows P_(m-1), P_m interlace (weak, unordered) for every m >= 2
The roots of consecutive polynomials alternate on the real line.by the cited steps:
e-731bf5f7395212d6
Proof chains
1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON
-
preserver_image euler_polynomial, shift 0
e-731bf5f7395212d6Laguerre’s theorem on multiplier sequences [SP14; Bra15, Thm 40] polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle read by rows: T(n, k) = binomial(2n, 2k).
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 1, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
theorem_check three_term_recurrence
e-1375f2f1a11f9809root: theorem checkThree-term recurrence criterion [Sze39, §3.3; Fav35] polytool ?
-
preserver_image reversal, shift 0
e-a5e3cd5a8b6d6a1aAffine, reversal and Möbius substitutions (elementary) polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle read by rows: T(n, k) = binomial(2n, 2k).
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 1, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle read by rows: T(n, k) = binomial(2n, 2k).
-
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle read by rows: T(n, k) = binomial(2n, 2k).
Related sequences ?
No candidate equalities or related sequences.
References
- [Bra15] Petter Brändén. Unimodality, log-concavity, real-rootedness and beyond. Handbook of enumerative combinatorics, :437–483, March 2015. doi:10.1201/b18255-10
- [Fav35] Jean Favard. Sur les polynômes de tchebicheff. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 200:2052–2053, 1935.
- [SP14] J Schur and G Polya. Über zwei Arten von Faktorenfolgen in der Theorie der algebraischen Gleichungen. J. Reine Angew. Math., 1914.
- [Sze39] G. Szegő. Orthogonal Polynomials. Colloquium publications, American Mathematical Society, 1939. doi:10.1090/coll/023