A143495 → θ+1

nonnegative coefficients

Proved for all n: all roots real, in (−∞, 0] · coefficients of one sign · interlacing (weak) · Hadamard kernel what this means

Recurrence
\(P_{n}(x) = \left(-6 - 4\,x - x^{2}\right)\,P_{n-2}(x) + \left(-2\,x - x^{2}\right)\,P_{n-2}'(x) + \left(5 + 2\,x\right)\,P_{n-1}(x) + \left(x\right)\,P_{n-1}'(x)\)
\(P_{1}(x) = 1\)
\(P_{2}(x) = 3 + 2\,x\)

Rows ?

nx0x1x2x3x4x5x6x7Pn(1)
111
2325
3914326
42774364141
581350291725799
62431562198082012564736
772967341224375601900198729371
821872839471316616842275038642948190497

Generated b-files: A045379 (row sums) ?

Computed in your browser ?

Technical details
Node id
n-ab79cd460b94a5bd · revision 1 · JSON
Definition source
derived:theta_plus_one
Fingerprint
f6-4dee50b16fc7a87e

Observed on the stored rows ?

  • Degrees: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 (affine: slope 1, intercept -1)
  • Palindromic rows: no
  • γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
  • Nonnegative coefficients (nonn): yes
  • Only rational roots (rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no

OEIS matches ?

A generated b-file is computed from the node's definition along the row alignment of its OEIS link and starts at the entry's offset. It is an identification on a finite prefix, not a proof that the node and the OEIS entry agree for every n.

OEIS submission text ?

Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula %F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows. For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched; the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.

The atlas's own rows: n = 1, …, ascending powers of x
%e Example
Triangle begins:
   1:     1;
   2:     3,      2;
   3:     9,     14,       3;
   4:    27,     74,      36,       4;
   5:    81,    350,     291,      72,       5;
   6:   243,   1562,    1980,     820,     125,      6;
   7:   729,   6734,   12243,    7560,    1900,    198,      7;
   8:  2187,  28394,   71316,   61684,   22750,   3864,    294,     8;
   9:  6561, 117950,  399171,  465192,  236355,  58212,   7154,   416,   9;
  10: 19683, 484922, 2172780, 3323380, 2235975, 749322, 132300, 12336, 567, 10;
%F Formula
The row polynomials satisfy P(n,x) = -(6+4*x+x^2)*P(n-2,x) - (2*x+x^2)*d/dx P(n-2,x) + (5+2*x)*P(n-1,x) + x*d/dx P(n-1,x) for n >= 3, with P(1,x) = 1, P(2,x) = 3 + 2*x.
%t Mathematica
P[1, x_] := 1;
P[2, x_] := 3 + 2*x;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[-(6 + 4*x + x^2)*P[n - 2, x] - (2*x + x^2)*D[P[n - 2, x], x] + (5 + 2*x)*P[n - 1, x] + x*D[P[n - 1, x], x]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 1, 10}] // Flatten
%o PARI/GP
P(N) = {my(v = vector(N)); v[1] = 1; v[2] = 3 + 2*x; for(n = 3, N, my(i = n); v[i] = -(6 + 4*x + x^2)*v[i - 2] - (2*x + x^2)*deriv(v[i - 2], x) + (5 + 2*x)*v[i - 1] + x*deriv(v[i - 1], x)); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i, v[i])))};
T(10)

Generated with polytool c48629374597.

Proved properties

  • Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 1, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
    Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.
    by the cited steps: e-8b885dd48ba326e7
  • Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 1: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
    All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).
    derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem: e-8b885dd48ba326e7
  • Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 1, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
    Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.
    derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem: e-8b885dd48ba326e7
  • Interlacing of consecutive rows. Rows P_(m-1), P_m interlace (weak, unordered) for every m >= 2
    The roots of consecutive polynomials alternate on the real line.
    by the cited steps: e-8b885dd48ba326e7

Proof chains

1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON

No candidate equalities or related sequences.

References

  1. [Bra15] Petter Brändén. Unimodality, log-concavity, real-rootedness and beyond. Handbook of enumerative combinatorics, :437–483, March 2015. doi:10.1201/b18255-10
  2. [LW07] Lily L. Liu and Yi Wang. A unified approach to polynomial sequences with only real zeros. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 38(4):542–560, May 2007. doi:10.1016/j.aam.2006.02.003
  3. [MW08] Shi-Mei Ma and Yi Wang. q-Eulerian polynomials and polynomials with only real zeros. The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, 15(1):Research Paper 17, January 2008. doi:10.37236/741
  4. [SP14] J Schur and G Polya. Über zwei Arten von Faktorenfolgen in der Theorie der algebraischen Gleichungen. J. Reine Angew. Math., 1914.