A114656 → θ+1
nonnegative coefficients
Proved for all n: all roots real, in (−∞, 0] · coefficients of one sign · interlacing (weak) · Hadamard kernel what this means
Rows ?
| n | x0 | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | Pn(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | ||||||
| 3 | 4 | 12 | 3 | 19 | |||||
| 4 | 8 | 48 | 36 | 4 | 96 | ||||
| 5 | 16 | 160 | 240 | 80 | 5 | 501 | |||
| 6 | 32 | 480 | 1200 | 800 | 150 | 6 | 2668 | ||
| 7 | 64 | 1344 | 5040 | 5600 | 2100 | 252 | 7 | 14407 | |
| 8 | 128 | 3584 | 18816 | 31360 | 19600 | 4704 | 392 | 8 | 78592 |
Generated b-files: A156136 (reversed triangle) ?
Computed in your browser ?
Technical details
- Node id
n-9d80e1b19273e824· revision 1 · JSON- Definition source
derived:theta_plus_one- Fingerprint
f6-c5faa49c64af63fa
Observed on the stored rows ?
- Degrees: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 (affine: slope 1, intercept -1)
- Palindromic rows: no
- γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
- Nonnegative coefficients (
nonn): yes - Only rational roots (
rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no
OEIS matches ?
- A156136: reversed triangle, 50 terms agree, 9 full rows row-aligned (tabl) OEIS nonn · view at the OEIS · generated b-file 990 terms from n = 0 ?
- A047781: row sums, 15 terms agree OEIS nonn (row-sum match: finite agreement only) · view at the OEIS
A generated b-file is computed from the node's definition along the row alignment of its OEIS link and starts at the entry's offset. It is an identification on a finite prefix, not a proof that the node and the OEIS entry agree for every n.
OEIS submission text ?
Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula
%F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows.
For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched;
the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a
finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.
The atlas's own rows: n = 1, …, ascending powers of x
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 1: 1; 2: 2, 2; 3: 4, 12, 3; 4: 8, 48, 36, 4; 5: 16, 160, 240, 80, 5; 6: 32, 480, 1200, 800, 150, 6; 7: 64, 1344, 5040, 5600, 2100, 252, 7; 8: 128, 3584, 18816, 31360, 19600, 4704, 392, 8; 9: 256, 9216, 64512, 150528, 141120, 56448, 9408, 576, 9; 10: 512, 23040, 207360, 645120, 846720, 508032, 141120, 17280, 810, 10;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy (n^2-n)*P(n,x) = (2*n^2-2*n+(3*n^2-5*n+2)*x)*P(n-1,x) + ((4*n-2)*x-(2*n-1)*x^2)*d/dx P(n-1,x) for n >= 2, with P(1,x) = 1.
%t MathematicaP[1, x_] := 1;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[Together[((2*n^2 - 2*n + (3*n^2 - 5*n + 2)*x)*P[n - 1, x] + ((4*n - 2)*x - (2*n - 1)*x^2)*D[P[n - 1, x], x])/(n^2 - n)]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 1, 10}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N)); v[1] = 1; for(n = 2, N, my(i = n); v[i] = ((2*n^2 - 2*n + (3*n^2 - 5*n + 2)*x)*v[i - 1] + ((4*n - 2)*x - (2*n - 1)*x^2)*deriv(v[i - 1], x))/(n^2 - n)); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i, v[i])))};
T(10)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
A156136: reversed triangle, offset 0, from the row P1
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 0: 1; 1: 2, 2; 2: 3, 12, 4; 3: 4, 36, 48, 8; 4: 5, 80, 240, 160, 16; 5: 6, 150, 800, 1200, 480, 32; 6: 7, 252, 2100, 5600, 5040, 1344, 64; 7: 8, 392, 4704, 19600, 31360, 18816, 3584, 128; 8: 9, 576, 9408, 56448, 141120, 150528, 64512, 9216, 256; 9: 10, 810, 17280, 141120, 508032, 846720, 645120, 207360, 23040, 512;
%F FormulaRow n lists the coefficients of P(n,x) in descending powers of x, where (n^2+n)*P(n,x) = (2*n^2+2*n+(3*n^2+n)*x)*P(n-1,x) + ((4*n+2)*x-(2*n+1)*x^2)*d/dx P(n-1,x) for n >= 1, with P(0,x) = 1.
%t MathematicaP[0, x_] := 1;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[Together[((2*n^2 + 2*n + (3*n^2 + n)*x)*P[n - 1, x] + ((4*n + 2)*x - (2*n + 1)*x^2)*D[P[n - 1, x], x])/(n^2 + n)]];
Table[Reverse[PadRight[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], n + 1]], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 1; for(n = 1, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = ((2*n^2 + 2*n + (3*n^2 + n)*x)*v[i - 1] + ((4*n + 2)*x - (2*n + 1)*x^2)*deriv(v[i - 1], x))/(n^2 + n)); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c = concat(c, vector(n + 1 - #c)); c = Vecrev(c); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
Proved properties
-
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 1, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-57c7b63013beaaa7 -
Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 1: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-57c7b63013beaaa7 -
Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 1, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-57c7b63013beaaa7 -
Interlacing of consecutive rows. Rows P_(m-1), P_m interlace (weak, unordered) for every m >= 2
The roots of consecutive polynomials alternate on the real line.by the cited steps:
e-57c7b63013beaaa7
Proof chains
1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON
-
preserver_image euler_polynomial, shift 0
e-57c7b63013beaaa7Laguerre’s theorem on multiplier sequences [SP14; Bra15, Thm 40] polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle read by rows: T(n,k) is the number of double rise-bicolored Dyck paths (double rises come in two colors; also …
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 1, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
theorem_check three_term_recurrence
e-e6c0603bd7c28948root: theorem checkThree-term recurrence criterion [Sze39, §3.3; Fav35] polytool ?
-
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle read by rows: T(n,k) is the number of double rise-bicolored Dyck paths (double rises come in two colors; also …
Related sequences ?
Same fingerprint (1)
Equal up to content, sign, reversal and a small index shift.
References
- [Bra15] Petter Brändén. Unimodality, log-concavity, real-rootedness and beyond. Handbook of enumerative combinatorics, :437–483, March 2015. doi:10.1201/b18255-10
- [Fav35] Jean Favard. Sur les polynômes de tchebicheff. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 200:2052–2053, 1935.
- [SP14] J Schur and G Polya. Über zwei Arten von Faktorenfolgen in der Theorie der algebraischen Gleichungen. J. Reine Angew. Math., 1914.
- [Sze39] G. Szegő. Orthogonal Polynomials. Colloquium publications, American Mathematical Society, 1939. doi:10.1090/coll/023