A266213 → θ+1
nonnegative coefficients
Proved for all n: all roots real, in (−∞, 0] · coefficients of one sign · interlacing (weak) · Hadamard kernel what this means
Rows ?
| n | x0 | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | x8 | x9 | x10 | x11 | x12 | x13 | Pn(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||
| 2 | 1 | 4 | 5 | ||||||||||||
| 3 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 15 | |||||||||||
| 4 | 1 | 12 | 24 | 8 | 45 | ||||||||||
| 5 | 1 | 16 | 54 | 48 | 10 | 129 | |||||||||
| 6 | 1 | 20 | 96 | 152 | 80 | 12 | 361 | ||||||||
| 7 | 1 | 24 | 150 | 352 | 330 | 120 | 14 | 991 | |||||||
| 8 | 1 | 28 | 216 | 680 | 960 | 612 | 168 | 16 | 2681 | ||||||
| 9 | 1 | 32 | 294 | 1168 | 2250 | 2160 | 1022 | 224 | 18 | 7169 | |||||
| 10 | 1 | 36 | 384 | 1848 | 4560 | 6012 | 4256 | 1584 | 288 | 20 | 18989 | ||||
| 11 | 1 | 40 | 486 | 2752 | 8330 | 14184 | 13790 | 7616 | 2322 | 360 | 22 | 49903 | |||
| 12 | 1 | 44 | 600 | 3912 | 14080 | 29652 | 37352 | 28240 | 12672 | 3260 | 440 | 24 | 130277 | ||
| 13 | 1 | 48 | 726 | 5360 | 22410 | 56544 | 88494 | 86688 | 53010 | 19920 | 4422 | 528 | 26 | 338177 | |
| 14 | 1 | 52 | 864 | 7128 | 34000 | 100332 | 189056 | 230512 | 182304 | 92900 | 29920 | 5832 | 624 | 28 | 873553 |
Computed in your browser ?
Technical details
- Node id
n-94c5677ff5a75240· revision 2 · JSON- Definition source
derived:theta_plus_one- Fingerprint
f6-cedb3b99895f1c1f
Observed on the stored rows ?
- Degrees: 0, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 (irregular)
- Palindromic rows: no
- γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
- Nonnegative coefficients (
nonn): yes - Only rational roots (
rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no
OEIS matches ?
No OEIS matches.
OEIS submission text ?
Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula
%F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows.
For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched;
the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a
finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.
The atlas's own rows: n = 0, …, ascending powers of x
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 0: 1; 1: 1; 2: 1, 4; 3: 1, 8, 6; 4: 1, 12, 24, 8; 5: 1, 16, 54, 48, 10; 6: 1, 20, 96, 152, 80, 12; 7: 1, 24, 150, 352, 330, 120, 14; 8: 1, 28, 216, 680, 960, 612, 168, 16; 9: 1, 32, 294, 1168, 2250, 2160, 1022, 224, 18;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy -(n^2+n+(2*n^3-n^2+n+4)*x-(2*n^3-n^2-3*n-6)*x^2-(n^2-3*n+2)*x^3)*P(n,x) = -(n^2+n+(2*n^3+7*n^2+n-4)*x+(6*n^3+7*n^2+n-6)*x^2+(n^2-3*n+2)*x^3)*P(n-1,x) + ((n+1)*x+(2*n^2+10*n+9)*x^2+(12*n^2+26*n+19)*x^3+(2*n^2+10*n+3)*x^4+n*x^5)*d/dx P(n-1,x) for n >= 1, with P(0,x) = 1.
%t MathematicaP[0, x_] := 1;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[Together[(-(n^2 + n + (2*n^3 + 7*n^2 + n - 4)*x + (6*n^3 + 7*n^2 + n - 6)*x^2 + (n^2 - 3*n + 2)*x^3)*P[n - 1, x] + ((n + 1)*x + (2*n^2 + 10*n + 9)*x^2 + (12*n^2 + 26*n + 19)*x^3 + (2*n^2 + 10*n + 3)*x^4 + n*x^5)*D[P[n - 1, x], x])/(-n^2 - n - (2*n^3 - n^2 + n + 4)*x + (2*n^3 - n^2 - 3*n - 6)*x^2 + (n^2 - 3*n + 2)*x^3)]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 1; for(n = 1, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = (-(n^2 + n + (2*n^3 + 7*n^2 + n - 4)*x + (6*n^3 + 7*n^2 + n - 6)*x^2 + (n^2 - 3*n + 2)*x^3)*v[i - 1] + ((n + 1)*x + (2*n^2 + 10*n + 9)*x^2 + (12*n^2 + 26*n + 19)*x^3 + (2*n^2 + 10*n + 3)*x^4 + n*x^5)*deriv(v[i - 1], x))/(-n^2 - n - (2*n^3 - n^2 + n + 4)*x + (2*n^3 - n^2 - 3*n - 6)*x^2 + (n^2 - 3*n + 2)*x^3)); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
Proved properties
-
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-1b28fe7d21cc4e12 -
Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 0: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-1b28fe7d21cc4e12 -
Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 0, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-1b28fe7d21cc4e12 -
Interlacing of consecutive rows. Rows P_(m-1), P_m interlace (weak, unordered) for every m >= 2
The roots of consecutive polynomials alternate on the real line.by the cited steps:
e-1b28fe7d21cc4e12,e-46d00cd0dd655b47 -
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 1, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-46d00cd0dd655b47 -
Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 1: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-46d00cd0dd655b47 -
Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 1, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-46d00cd0dd655b47
Proof chains
2 incoming proof steps. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON
-
preserver_image euler_polynomial, shift 0
e-1b28fe7d21cc4e12Laguerre’s theorem on multiplier sequences [SP14; Bra15, Thm 40] polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
Square array A(n,r), the number of neighbors at a sharp Manhattan distance r in a finite n-hypercube lattice, read by u…
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
theorem_check liu_wang_derivative_lag
e-1e993b9b3c7faf34root: theorem checkLiu–Wang theorem with a lag row [LW07, Thm 2.1] RealRooted ?
-
-
premise (sequence):
Square array A(n,r), the number of neighbors at a sharp Manhattan distance r in a finite n-hypercube lattice, read by u…
-
preserver_image euler_polynomial, shift 0
e-46d00cd0dd655b47Laguerre’s theorem on multiplier sequences [SP14; Bra15, Thm 40] polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
Table a(d,m) of number of points of L1 norm m in cubic lattice Z^d, read by antidiagonals (d >= 1, m >= 0).
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 1, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
theorem_check liu_wang_derivative_lag
e-f5199491b1877911root: theorem checkLiu–Wang theorem with a lag row [LW07, Thm 2.1] RealRooted ?
-
-
premise (sequence):
Table a(d,m) of number of points of L1 norm m in cubic lattice Z^d, read by antidiagonals (d >= 1, m >= 0).
Related sequences ?
No candidate equalities or related sequences.
References
- [Bra15] Petter Brändén. Unimodality, log-concavity, real-rootedness and beyond. Handbook of enumerative combinatorics, :437–483, March 2015. doi:10.1201/b18255-10
- [LW07] Lily L. Liu and Yi Wang. A unified approach to polynomial sequences with only real zeros. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 38(4):542–560, May 2007. doi:10.1016/j.aam.2006.02.003
- [SP14] J Schur and G Polya. Über zwei Arten von Faktorenfolgen in der Theorie der algebraischen Gleichungen. J. Reine Angew. Math., 1914.