A102662 → θ+1
nonnegative coefficients
Proved for all n: all roots real, in (−∞, 0] · coefficients of one sign · interlacing (weak) · Hadamard kernel what this means
Rows ?
| n | x0 | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | Pn(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 1 | 1 | 6 | 7 | ||||||
| 2 | 1 | 10 | 9 | 20 | |||||
| 3 | 1 | 14 | 33 | 12 | 60 | ||||
| 4 | 1 | 18 | 69 | 68 | 15 | 171 | |||
| 5 | 1 | 22 | 117 | 204 | 115 | 18 | 477 | ||
| 6 | 1 | 26 | 177 | 452 | 455 | 174 | 21 | 1306 | |
| 7 | 1 | 30 | 249 | 844 | 1275 | 858 | 245 | 24 | 3526 |
Computed in your browser ?
Technical details
- Node id
n-8a12c68ee675183d· revision 1 · JSON- Definition source
derived:theta_plus_one- Fingerprint
f6-9cf2e4e000585341
Observed on the stored rows ?
- Degrees: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 (affine: slope 1, intercept 0)
- Palindromic rows: no
- γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
- Nonnegative coefficients (
nonn): yes - Only rational roots (
rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no
OEIS matches ?
No OEIS matches.
OEIS submission text ?
Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula
%F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows.
For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched;
the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a
finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.
The atlas's own rows: n = 0, …, ascending powers of x
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 0: 1; 1: 1, 6; 2: 1, 10, 9; 3: 1, 14, 33, 12; 4: 1, 18, 69, 68, 15; 5: 1, 22, 117, 204, 115, 18; 6: 1, 26, 177, 452, 455, 174, 21; 7: 1, 30, 249, 844, 1275, 858, 245, 24; 8: 1, 34, 333, 1412, 2895, 2934, 1449, 328, 27; 9: 1, 38, 429, 2188, 5715, 7938, 5873, 2264, 423, 30;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy P(n,x) = -x^2*P(n-4,x) - (2*x+2*x^2)*P(n-3,x) - (1+x^2)*P(n-2,x) + (2+2*x)*P(n-1,x) for n >= 4, with P(0,x) = 1, P(1,x) = 1 + 6*x, P(2,x) = 1 + 10*x + 9*x^2, P(3,x) = 1 + 14*x + 33*x^2 + 12*x^3.
%t MathematicaP[0, x_] := 1;
P[1, x_] := 1 + 6*x;
P[2, x_] := 1 + 10*x + 9*x^2;
P[3, x_] := 1 + 14*x + 33*x^2 + 12*x^3;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[-x^2*P[n - 4, x] - (2*x + 2*x^2)*P[n - 3, x] - (1 + x^2)*P[n - 2, x] + (2 + 2*x)*P[n - 1, x]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 1; v[2] = 1 + 6*x; v[3] = 1 + 10*x + 9*x^2; v[4] = 1 + 14*x + 33*x^2 + 12*x^3; for(n = 4, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = -x^2*v[i - 4] - (2*x + 2*x^2)*v[i - 3] - (1 + x^2)*v[i - 2] + (2 + 2*x)*v[i - 1]); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
Proved properties
-
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-3e98f257bdd1a607 -
Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 0: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-3e98f257bdd1a607 -
Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 0, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-3e98f257bdd1a607 -
Interlacing of consecutive rows. Rows P_(m-1), P_m interlace (weak, unordered) for every m >= 1
The roots of consecutive polynomials alternate on the real line.by the cited steps:
e-3e98f257bdd1a607
Proof chains
1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON
-
preserver_image euler_polynomial, shift 0
e-3e98f257bdd1a607Laguerre’s theorem on multiplier sequences [SP14; Bra15, Thm 40] polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle read by rows: T(1,1)=1,T(2,1)=1,T(2,2)=3, T(k-1,r-1)+T(k-1,r)+T(k-2,r-1).
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
theorem_check liu_wang_derivative_lag
e-5b6052467d550b8droot: theorem checkLiu–Wang theorem with a lag row [LW07, Thm 2.1] RealRooted ?
-
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle read by rows: T(1,1)=1,T(2,1)=1,T(2,2)=3, T(k-1,r-1)+T(k-1,r)+T(k-2,r-1).
Related sequences ?
No candidate equalities or related sequences.
References
- [Bra15] Petter Brändén. Unimodality, log-concavity, real-rootedness and beyond. Handbook of enumerative combinatorics, :437–483, March 2015. doi:10.1201/b18255-10
- [LW07] Lily L. Liu and Yi Wang. A unified approach to polynomial sequences with only real zeros. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 38(4):542–560, May 2007. doi:10.1016/j.aam.2006.02.003
- [SP14] J Schur and G Polya. Über zwei Arten von Faktorenfolgen in der Theorie der algebraischen Gleichungen. J. Reine Angew. Math., 1914.