A033282 → θ+1

nonnegative coefficients

Proved for all n: all roots real, in (−∞, 0] · coefficients of one sign · interlacing (weak) · Hadamard kernel what this means

Recurrence
\(\left(2\,n + n^{2}\right)\,P_{n}(x) = \left(4\,x + 2\,n + 6\,n x + n^{2} + 2\,n^{2} x\right)\,P_{n-1}(x) + \left(2\,x + 2\,x^{2} + 2\,n x + 2\,n x^{2}\right)\,P_{n-1}'(x)\)
\(P_{0}(x) = 1\)

Rows ?

nx0x1x2x3x4x5x6x7Pn(1)
011
1145
21101526
31186356138
4128168336210743
5140360120016507924043
6154675330074257722300322180
71701155770025025420423503511440122468

Generated b-files: A035029 (row sums) ?

Computed in your browser ?

Technical details
Node id
n-7b4f74988046113d · revision 1 · JSON
Definition source
derived:theta_plus_one
Fingerprint
f6-6832a290ef8b97c2

Observed on the stored rows ?

  • Degrees: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 (affine: slope 1, intercept 0)
  • Palindromic rows: no
  • γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
  • Nonnegative coefficients (nonn): yes
  • Only rational roots (rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no

OEIS matches ?

A generated b-file is computed from the node's definition along the row alignment of its OEIS link and starts at the entry's offset. It is an identification on a finite prefix, not a proof that the node and the OEIS entry agree for every n.

OEIS submission text ?

Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula %F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows. For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched; the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.

The atlas's own rows: n = 0, …, ascending powers of x
%e Example
Triangle begins:
  0: 1;
  1: 1,   4;
  2: 1,  10,   15;
  3: 1,  18,   63,    56;
  4: 1,  28,  168,   336,    210;
  5: 1,  40,  360,  1200,   1650,    792;
  6: 1,  54,  675,  3300,   7425,   7722,    3003;
  7: 1,  70, 1155,  7700,  25025,  42042,   35035,   11440;
  8: 1,  88, 1848, 16016,  70070, 168168,  224224,  155584,  43758;
  9: 1, 108, 2808, 30576, 171990, 550368, 1039584, 1145664, 680238, 167960;
%F Formula
The row polynomials satisfy (n^2+2*n)*P(n,x) = (n^2+2*n+(2*n^2+6*n+4)*x)*P(n-1,x) + ((2*n+2)*x+(2*n+2)*x^2)*d/dx P(n-1,x) for n >= 1, with P(0,x) = 1.
%t Mathematica
P[0, x_] := 1;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[Together[((n^2 + 2*n + (2*n^2 + 6*n + 4)*x)*P[n - 1, x] + ((2*n + 2)*x + (2*n + 2)*x^2)*D[P[n - 1, x], x])/(n^2 + 2*n)]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten
%o PARI/GP
P(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 1; for(n = 1, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = ((n^2 + 2*n + (2*n^2 + 6*n + 4)*x)*v[i - 1] + ((2*n + 2)*x + (2*n + 2)*x^2)*deriv(v[i - 1], x))/(n^2 + 2*n)); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)

Generated with polytool c48629374597.

Proved properties

  • Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
    Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.
    by the cited steps: e-10c4942a23949b48
  • Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 0: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
    All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).
    derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem: e-10c4942a23949b48
  • Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 0, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
    Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.
    derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem: e-10c4942a23949b48
  • Interlacing of consecutive rows. Rows P_(m-1), P_m interlace (weak, unordered) for every m >= 1
    The roots of consecutive polynomials alternate on the real line.
    by the cited steps: e-10c4942a23949b48

Proof chains

1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON

Candidate equalities (1)

Definitions that agree on the stored rows without an all-n certificate.

References

  1. [Bra15] Petter Brändén. Unimodality, log-concavity, real-rootedness and beyond. Handbook of enumerative combinatorics, :437–483, March 2015. doi:10.1201/b18255-10
  2. [Fav35] Jean Favard. Sur les polynômes de tchebicheff. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 200:2052–2053, 1935.
  3. [SP14] J Schur and G Polya. Über zwei Arten von Faktorenfolgen in der Theorie der algebraischen Gleichungen. J. Reine Angew. Math., 1914.
  4. [Sze39] G. Szegő. Orthogonal Polynomials. Colloquium publications, American Mathematical Society, 1939. doi:10.1090/coll/023