A113953 → x ↦ x−2
Proved for all n: all roots real, in (−6, 2] · interlacing (weak) what this means
Rows ?
| n | x0 | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | Pn(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 1 | -2 | 1 | -1 | ||||||
| 2 | 0 | -2 | 1 | -1 | |||||
| 3 | 8 | -4 | -2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | -16 | 24 | -8 | -2 | 1 | -1 | |||
| 5 | 0 | -32 | 40 | -12 | -2 | 1 | -5 | ||
| 6 | 64 | -64 | -32 | 56 | -16 | -2 | 1 | 7 | |
| 7 | -128 | 320 | -224 | -16 | 72 | -20 | -2 | 1 | 3 |
Computed in your browser ?
Technical details
- Node id
n-7914dcf2bf97e042· revision 1 · JSON- Definition source
derived:basis_map_coefficients_of:oeis_catalog:A113953- Fingerprint
f6-3261a32f89c887ba
Observed on the stored rows ?
- Degrees: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 (affine: slope 1, intercept 0)
- Palindromic rows: no
- γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
- Nonnegative coefficients (
nonn): no - Only rational roots (
rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no
OEIS matches ?
- A001607: row sums, 15 terms agree (row-sum match: finite agreement only) · view at the OEIS
OEIS submission text ?
Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula
%F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows.
For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched;
the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a
finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.
The atlas's own rows: n = 0, …, ascending powers of x
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 0: 1; 1: -2, 1; 2: 0, -2, 1; 3: 8, -4, -2, 1; 4: -16, 24, -8, -2, 1; 5: 0, -32, 40, -12, -2, 1; 6: 64, -64, -32, 56, -16, -2, 1; 7: -128, 320, -224, -16, 72, -20, -2, 1; 8: 0, -384, 768, -480, 16, 88, -24, -2, 1; 9: 512, -768, -384, 1344, -832, 64, 104, -28, -2, 1;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy P(n,x) = -(2-x)*P(n-1,x) - (4-2*x)*P(n-2,x) for n >= 2, with P(0,x) = 1, P(1,x) = -2 + x.
%t MathematicaP[0, x_] := 1;
P[1, x_] := -2 + x;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[-(2 - x)*P[n - 1, x] - (4 - 2*x)*P[n - 2, x]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 1; v[2] = -2 + x; for(n = 2, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = -(2 - x)*v[i - 1] - (4 - 2*x)*v[i - 2]); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
Proved properties
-
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-6, 2]
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-c345fe1d5254381d -
Interlacing of consecutive rows. Rows P_(m-1), P_m interlace (weak, unordered) for every m >= 1
The roots of consecutive polynomials alternate on the real line.by the cited steps:
e-c345fe1d5254381d
Proof chains
1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON
-
preserver_image affine, shift 0
e-c345fe1d5254381dAffine, reversal and Möbius substitutions (elementary) polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
A Jacobsthal triangle.
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-8, 0]
-
theorem_check ma_wang_interval
e-2d5b16bf2955a407root: theorem checkMa–Wang interval theorem [MW08, Thm 2, Cor 3] RealRooted RealRooted.affineEndpointStep_closed ?
-
-
premise (sequence):
A Jacobsthal triangle.
Used in 1 proof step
e-a0ae771232cbba16basis_map (A038207) → A Jacobsthal triangle.
Related sequences ?
No candidate equalities or related sequences.
References
- [MW08] Shi-Mei Ma and Yi Wang. q-Eulerian polynomials and polynomials with only real zeros. The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, 15(1):Research Paper 17, January 2008. doi:10.37236/741