chebyshev_u → D
Proved for all n: all roots real · interlacing (weak) what this means
Rows ?
| n | x0 | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | Pn(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | |||||||
| 1 | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| 2 | 0 | 8 | 8 | |||||
| 3 | -4 | 0 | 24 | 20 | ||||
| 4 | 0 | -24 | 0 | 64 | 40 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 0 | -96 | 0 | 160 | 70 | ||
| 6 | 0 | 48 | 0 | -320 | 0 | 384 | 112 | |
| 7 | -8 | 0 | 240 | 0 | -960 | 0 | 896 | 168 |
Computed in your browser ?
Technical details
- Node id
n-73147f660e12d671· revision 1 · JSON- Definition source
derived:derivative- Fingerprint
f6-865456471a330200
Observed on the stored rows ?
- Degrees: -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 (affine: slope 1, intercept -1)
- Palindromic rows: no
- γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
- Nonnegative coefficients (
nonn): no - Only rational roots (
rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no
OEIS matches ?
- A007290: row sums, 15 terms agree OEIS nonn (row-sum match: finite agreement only) · view at the OEIS
OEIS submission text ?
Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula
%F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows.
For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched;
the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a
finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.
The atlas's own rows: n = 0, …, ascending powers of x
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 0: 0; 1: 2; 2: 0, 8; 3: -4, 0, 24; 4: 0, -24, 0, 64; 5: 6, 0, -96, 0, 160; 6: 0, 48, 0, -320, 0, 384; 7: -8, 0, 240, 0, -960, 0, 896; 8: 0, -80, 0, 960, 0, -2688, 0, 2048; 9: 10, 0, -480, 0, 3360, 0, -7168, 0, 4608;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy (n-1)*P(n,x) = (n+2)*x*P(n-1,x) - (1-x^2)*d/dx P(n-1,x) for n >= 2, with P(0,x) = 0, P(1,x) = 2.
%t MathematicaP[0, x_] := 0;
P[1, x_] := 2;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[Together[((n + 2)*x*P[n - 1, x] - (1 - x^2)*D[P[n - 1, x], x])/(n - 1)]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 0; v[2] = 2; for(n = 2, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = ((n + 2)*x*v[i - 1] - (1 - x^2)*deriv(v[i - 1], x))/(n - 1)); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
Proved properties
-
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, +inf)
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-bc07b513df8cc1f5 -
Interlacing of consecutive rows. Rows P_(m-1), P_m interlace (weak, unordered) for every m >= 1
The roots of consecutive polynomials alternate on the real line.by the cited steps:
e-bc07b513df8cc1f5
Proof chains
1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON
-
preserver_image derivative_polynomial, shift 0
e-bc07b513df8cc1f5Laguerre’s theorem on differential operators [SP14] polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
chebyshev_u
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, +inf)
-
theorem_check three_term_recurrence
e-a7b3a0c81265a049root: theorem checkThree-term recurrence criterion [Sze39, §3.3; Fav35] polytool ?
-
theorem_check three_term_recurrence
e-8ab839cedecfc233root: theorem checkThree-term recurrence criterion [Sze39, §3.3; Fav35] polytool ?
-
-
premise (sequence):
chebyshev_u
Related sequences ?
Same fingerprint (1)
Equal up to content, sign, reversal and a small index shift.
References
- [Fav35] Jean Favard. Sur les polynômes de tchebicheff. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 200:2052–2053, 1935.
- [SP14] J Schur and G Polya. Über zwei Arten von Faktorenfolgen in der Theorie der algebraischen Gleichungen. J. Reine Angew. Math., 1914.
- [Sze39] G. Szegő. Orthogonal Polynomials. Colloquium publications, American Mathematical Society, 1939. doi:10.1090/coll/023