basis-map coefficients of A145596 → D
Proved for all n: all roots real what this means
Rows ?
| n | x0 | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | Pn(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | |||||||
| 1 | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 | |||||
| 3 | -8 | 16 | 12 | 20 | ||||
| 4 | -10 | -30 | 60 | 20 | 40 | |||
| 5 | 30 | -120 | -30 | 160 | 30 | 70 | ||
| 6 | 42 | 126 | -588 | 140 | 350 | 42 | 112 | |
| 7 | -112 | 672 | -168 | -1792 | 840 | 672 | 56 | 168 |
Computed in your browser ?
Technical details
- Node id
n-64e6cf669172ed21· revision 1 · JSON- Definition source
derived:derivative- Fingerprint
f6-f59a3fd2b0c3b9f1
Observed on the stored rows ?
- Degrees: -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 (affine: slope 1, intercept -1)
- Palindromic rows: no
- γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
- Nonnegative coefficients (
nonn): no - Only rational roots (
rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no
OEIS matches ?
- A007290: row sums, 15 terms agree OEIS nonn (row-sum match: finite agreement only) · view at the OEIS
OEIS submission text ?
Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula
%F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows.
For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched;
the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a
finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.
The atlas's own rows: n = 0, …, ascending powers of x
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 0: 0; 1: 2; 2: 2, 6; 3: -8, 16, 12; 4: -10, -30, 60, 20; 5: 30, -120, -30, 160, 30; 6: 42, 126, -588, 140, 350, 42; 7: -112, 672, -168, -1792, 840, 672, 56; 8: -168, -504, 4032, -3360, -3780, 2772, 1176, 72; 9: 420, -3360, 2520, 13440, -16800, -5040, 7140, 1920, 90;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy (n^2+3*n-4)*P(n,x) = -(2*n^2-2*n-10-(3*n^2+4*n-2)*x)*P(n-1,x) - (4*n+6-(6*n+9)*x+(2*n+3)*x^2)*d/dx P(n-1,x) for n >= 2, with P(0,x) = 0, P(1,x) = 2.
%t MathematicaP[0, x_] := 0;
P[1, x_] := 2;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[Together[(-(2*n^2 - 2*n - 10 - (3*n^2 + 4*n - 2)*x)*P[n - 1, x] - (4*n + 6 - (6*n + 9)*x + (2*n + 3)*x^2)*D[P[n - 1, x], x])/(n^2 + 3*n - 4)]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 0; v[2] = 2; for(n = 2, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = (-(2*n^2 - 2*n - 10 - (3*n^2 + 4*n - 2)*x)*v[i - 1] - (4*n + 6 - (6*n + 9)*x + (2*n + 3)*x^2)*deriv(v[i - 1], x))/(n^2 + 3*n - 4)); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
Proved properties
-
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, +inf)
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-01da8ccd2d2f1fb1
Proof chains
1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON
-
preserver_image derivative_polynomial, shift 0
e-01da8ccd2d2f1fb1Laguerre’s theorem on differential operators [SP14] polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
basis-map coefficients of Triangular array of generalized Narayana numbers: T(n, k) = 2*binomial(n + 1, k + 1)*binomial…
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, +inf)
-
preserver_image affine, shift 0
e-3babd9179153850cAffine, reversal and Möbius substitutions (elementary) polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
basis-map coefficients of Triangular array of generalized Narayana numbers: T(n, k) = 2*binomial(n + 1, k + 1)*binomial…
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
theorem_check liu_wang
e-c483eeee9c2638c9root: theorem checkLiu–Wang theorem [LW07, Thm 2.1, Cor 2.4] ?
-
preserver_image reversal, shift 0
e-1d2c7b4a3cb3d72fAffine, reversal and Möbius substitutions (elementary) polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
basis-map coefficients of Triangular array of generalized Narayana numbers: T(n, k) = 2*binomial(n + 1, k + 1)*binomial…
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
↵ theorem_check liu_wang
e-c483eeee9c2638c9(expanded above) -
basis_map A007318
e-fb63394f9047a486Geometric basis map (elementary) polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
basis-map coefficients of Triangular array of generalized Narayana numbers: T(n, k) = 2*binomial(n + 1, k + 1)*binomial…
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 1]no recorded property covers this requirement
-
premise (sequence):
basis-map coefficients of Triangular array of generalized Narayana numbers: T(n, k) = 2*binomial(n + 1, k + 1)*binomial…
-
↵ theorem_check liu_wang
-
premise (sequence):
basis-map coefficients of Triangular array of generalized Narayana numbers: T(n, k) = 2*binomial(n + 1, k + 1)*binomial…
-
↵ basis_map A007318
e-fb63394f9047a486(expanded above)
-
-
premise (sequence):
basis-map coefficients of Triangular array of generalized Narayana numbers: T(n, k) = 2*binomial(n + 1, k + 1)*binomial…
-
theorem_check three_term_recurrence
e-8ef8162b0ed7a444root: theorem checkThree-term recurrence criterion [Sze39, §3.3; Fav35] polytool ?
-
-
premise (sequence):
basis-map coefficients of Triangular array of generalized Narayana numbers: T(n, k) = 2*binomial(n + 1, k + 1)*binomial…
Related sequences ?
No candidate equalities or related sequences.
References
- [Fav35] Jean Favard. Sur les polynômes de tchebicheff. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 200:2052–2053, 1935.
- [LW07] Lily L. Liu and Yi Wang. A unified approach to polynomial sequences with only real zeros. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 38(4):542–560, May 2007. doi:10.1016/j.aam.2006.02.003
- [SP14] J Schur and G Polya. Über zwei Arten von Faktorenfolgen in der Theorie der algebraischen Gleichungen. J. Reine Angew. Math., 1914.
- [Sze39] G. Szegő. Orthogonal Polynomials. Colloquium publications, American Mathematical Society, 1939. doi:10.1090/coll/023