A122542 → (θ+1)²
nonnegative coefficients
Proved for all n: all roots real, in (−∞, 0] · coefficients of one sign · interlacing (weak) · Hadamard kernel what this means
Rows ?
| n | x0 | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | Pn(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| 3 | 0 | 8 | 9 | 17 | |||||
| 4 | 0 | 8 | 36 | 16 | 60 | ||||
| 5 | 0 | 8 | 72 | 96 | 25 | 201 | |||
| 6 | 0 | 8 | 108 | 288 | 200 | 36 | 640 | ||
| 7 | 0 | 8 | 144 | 608 | 800 | 360 | 49 | 1969 | |
| 8 | 0 | 8 | 180 | 1056 | 2200 | 1800 | 588 | 64 | 5896 |
Computed in your browser ?
Technical details
- Node id
n-62041b6e495f849d· revision 1 · JSON- Definition source
derived:theta_plus_one_squared- Fingerprint
f6-7ce493974858d62c
Observed on the stored rows ?
- Degrees: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 (affine: slope 1, intercept -1)
- Palindromic rows: no
- γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
- Nonnegative coefficients (
nonn): yes - Only rational roots (
rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no
OEIS matches ?
No OEIS matches.
OEIS submission text ?
Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula
%F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows.
For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched;
the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a
finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.
The atlas's own rows: n = 1, …, ascending powers of x
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 1: 1; 2: 0, 4; 3: 0, 8, 9; 4: 0, 8, 36, 16; 5: 0, 8, 72, 96, 25; 6: 0, 8, 108, 288, 200, 36; 7: 0, 8, 144, 608, 800, 360, 49; 8: 0, 8, 180, 1056, 2200, 1800, 588, 64; 9: 0, 8, 216, 1632, 4800, 6120, 3528, 896, 81; 10: 0, 8, 252, 2336, 9000, 16200, 14308, 6272, 1296, 100;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy P(n,x) = 9*x^2*P(n-4,x) + 4*x^3*d/dx P(n-4,x) - (4*x-18*x^2)*P(n-3,x) + (4*x^2+8*x^3)*d/dx P(n-3,x) - (1-9*x^2)*P(n-2,x) + 4*x^3*d/dx P(n-2,x) + (2+4*x)*P(n-1,x) - 4*x^2*d/dx P(n-1,x) for n >= 5, with P(1,x) = 1, P(2,x) = 4*x, P(3,x) = 8*x + 9*x^2, P(4,x) = 8*x + 36*x^2 + 16*x^3.
%t MathematicaP[1, x_] := 1;
P[2, x_] := 4*x;
P[3, x_] := 8*x + 9*x^2;
P[4, x_] := 8*x + 36*x^2 + 16*x^3;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[9*x^2*P[n - 4, x] + 4*x^3*D[P[n - 4, x], x] - (4*x - 18*x^2)*P[n - 3, x] + (4*x^2 + 8*x^3)*D[P[n - 3, x], x] - (1 - 9*x^2)*P[n - 2, x] + 4*x^3*D[P[n - 2, x], x] + (2 + 4*x)*P[n - 1, x] - 4*x^2*D[P[n - 1, x], x]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 1, 10}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N)); v[1] = 1; v[2] = 4*x; v[3] = 8*x + 9*x^2; v[4] = 8*x + 36*x^2 + 16*x^3; for(n = 5, N, my(i = n); v[i] = 9*x^2*v[i - 4] + 4*x^3*deriv(v[i - 4], x) - (4*x - 18*x^2)*v[i - 3] + (4*x^2 + 8*x^3)*deriv(v[i - 3], x) - (1 - 9*x^2)*v[i - 2] + 4*x^3*deriv(v[i - 2], x) + (2 + 4*x)*v[i - 1] - 4*x^2*deriv(v[i - 1], x)); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i, v[i])))};
T(10)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
Proved properties
-
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 1, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-75459cd887e4a44f -
Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 1: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-75459cd887e4a44f -
Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 1, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-75459cd887e4a44f -
Interlacing of consecutive rows. Rows P_(m-1), P_m interlace (weak, unordered) for every m >= 2
The roots of consecutive polynomials alternate on the real line.by the cited steps:
e-75459cd887e4a44f
Proof chains
1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON
-
preserver_image euler_polynomial, shift 0
e-75459cd887e4a44fLaguerre’s theorem on multiplier sequences [SP14; Bra15, Thm 40] polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle T(n,k), 0 <= k <= n, read by rows, given by [0, 2, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, ...] DELTA [1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, ...]…
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 1, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
theorem_check liu_wang_derivative_lag
e-e90fe0b3eba80839root: theorem checkLiu–Wang theorem with a lag row [LW07, Thm 2.1] RealRooted ?
-
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle T(n,k), 0 <= k <= n, read by rows, given by [0, 2, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, ...] DELTA [1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, ...]…
Related sequences ?
No candidate equalities or related sequences.
References
- [Bra15] Petter Brändén. Unimodality, log-concavity, real-rootedness and beyond. Handbook of enumerative combinatorics, :437–483, March 2015. doi:10.1201/b18255-10
- [LW07] Lily L. Liu and Yi Wang. A unified approach to polynomial sequences with only real zeros. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 38(4):542–560, May 2007. doi:10.1016/j.aam.2006.02.003
- [SP14] J Schur and G Polya. Über zwei Arten von Faktorenfolgen in der Theorie der algebraischen Gleichungen. J. Reine Angew. Math., 1914.