A102662 → x ↦ x+1
nonnegative coefficients
Proved for all n: all roots real, in (−∞, −1] · coefficients of one sign · interlacing (weak) · Hadamard kernel what this means
Rows ?
| n | x0 | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | Pn(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 1 | 4 | 3 | 7 | ||||||
| 2 | 9 | 11 | 3 | 23 | |||||
| 3 | 22 | 38 | 20 | 3 | 83 | ||||
| 4 | 53 | 118 | 92 | 29 | 3 | 295 | |||
| 5 | 128 | 349 | 360 | 173 | 38 | 3 | 1051 | ||
| 6 | 309 | 997 | 1279 | 827 | 281 | 47 | 3 | 3743 | |
| 7 | 746 | 2780 | 4264 | 3466 | 1600 | 416 | 56 | 3 | 13331 |
Computed in your browser ?
Technical details
- Node id
n-6154960a0891a0b7· revision 2 · JSON- Definition source
derived:basis_map_A007318- Fingerprint
f6-17308d7e6afb84eb
Observed on the stored rows ?
- Degrees: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 (affine: slope 1, intercept 0)
- Palindromic rows: no
- γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
- Nonnegative coefficients (
nonn): yes - Only rational roots (
rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no
OEIS matches ?
No OEIS matches.
OEIS submission text ?
Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula
%F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows.
For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched;
the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a
finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.
The atlas's own rows: n = 0, …, ascending powers of x
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 0: 1; 1: 4, 3; 2: 9, 11, 3; 3: 22, 38, 20, 3; 4: 53, 118, 92, 29, 3; 5: 128, 349, 360, 173, 38, 3; 6: 309, 997, 1279, 827, 281, 47, 3; 7: 746, 2780, 4264, 3466, 1600, 416, 56, 3; 8: 1801, 7612, 13584, 13302, 7774, 2760, 578, 65, 3; 9: 4348, 20551, 41824, 47918, 33916, 15310, 4388, 767, 74, 3;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy P(n,x) = (1+x)*P(n-2,x) + (2+x)*P(n-1,x) for n >= 2, with P(0,x) = 1, P(1,x) = 4 + 3*x.
%t MathematicaP[0, x_] := 1;
P[1, x_] := 4 + 3*x;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[(1 + x)*P[n - 2, x] + (2 + x)*P[n - 1, x]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 1; v[2] = 4 + 3*x; for(n = 2, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = (1 + x)*v[i - 2] + (2 + x)*v[i - 1]); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
Proved properties
-
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-8d8fb2debc89383b -
Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 0: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-6f86655597309e29,e-8d8fb2debc89383b -
Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 0, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-6f86655597309e29,e-8d8fb2debc89383b -
Interlacing of consecutive rows. Rows P_(m-1), P_m interlace (weak, unordered) for every m >= 1
The roots of consecutive polynomials alternate on the real line.by the cited steps:
e-6f86655597309e29,e-8d8fb2debc89383b -
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, -1]
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-6f86655597309e29
Proof chains
2 incoming proof steps. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON
-
basis_map A007318
e-8d8fb2debc89383bGeometric basis map (elementary) polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle read by rows: T(1,1)=1,T(2,1)=1,T(2,2)=3, T(k-1,r-1)+T(k-1,r)+T(k-2,r-1).
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
theorem_check liu_wang_derivative_lag
e-5b6052467d550b8droot: theorem checkLiu–Wang theorem with a lag row [LW07, Thm 2.1] RealRooted ?
-
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle read by rows: T(1,1)=1,T(2,1)=1,T(2,2)=3, T(k-1,r-1)+T(k-1,r)+T(k-2,r-1).
-
preserver_image affine, shift 0
e-6f86655597309e29Affine, reversal and Möbius substitutions (elementary) polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle read by rows: T(1,1)=1,T(2,1)=1,T(2,2)=3, T(k-1,r-1)+T(k-1,r)+T(k-2,r-1).
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle read by rows: T(1,1)=1,T(2,1)=1,T(2,2)=3, T(k-1,r-1)+T(k-1,r)+T(k-2,r-1).
Related sequences ?
No candidate equalities or related sequences.
References
- [LW07] Lily L. Liu and Yi Wang. A unified approach to polynomial sequences with only real zeros. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 38(4):542–560, May 2007. doi:10.1016/j.aam.2006.02.003