A144436 → γ
nonnegative coefficients
Proved for all n: all roots real, in (−∞, 0] · coefficients of one sign · Hadamard kernel what this means
Rows ?
| n | x0 | x1 | x2 | x3 | Pn(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2 | 1 | 6 | 7 | ||
| 3 | 1 | 20 | 21 | ||
| 4 | 1 | 50 | 64 | 115 | |
| 5 | 1 | 112 | 472 | 585 | |
| 6 | 1 | 238 | 2288 | 1200 | 3727 |
| 7 | 1 | 492 | 9216 | 15840 | 25549 |
Computed in your browser ?
Technical details
- Node id
n-57a09c7aaa187100· revision 1 · JSON- Definition source
derived:gamma_polynomial- Fingerprint
f6-ec1b6da9b0cf6ba2
Observed on the stored rows ?
- Degrees: 0, 0, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5, 5, 6, 6, 7 (half affine: slope 1, intercept 0)
- Palindromic rows: no
- γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
- Nonnegative coefficients (
nonn): yes - Only rational roots (
rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no
OEIS matches ?
No OEIS matches.
OEIS submission text ?
Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula
%F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows.
For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched;
the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a
finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.
The atlas's own rows: n = 0, …, ascending powers of x
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 0: 1; 1: 1; 2: 1, 6; 3: 1, 20; 4: 1, 50, 64; 5: 1, 112, 472; 6: 1, 238, 2288, 1200; 7: 1, 492, 9216, 15840; 8: 1, 1002, 33520, 127808, 36480; 9: 1, 2024, 114552, 816256, 756992;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy P(n,x) = (1+(2*n-2)*x)*P(n-1,x) + (x-4*x^2)*d/dx P(n-1,x) + 4*x*P(n-2,x) for n >= 2, with P(0,x) = 1, P(1,x) = 1.
%t MathematicaP[0, x_] := 1;
P[1, x_] := 1;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[(1 + (2*n - 2)*x)*P[n - 1, x] + (x - 4*x^2)*D[P[n - 1, x], x] + 4*x*P[n - 2, x]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 1; v[2] = 1; for(n = 2, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = (1 + (2*n - 2)*x)*v[i - 1] + (x - 4*x^2)*deriv(v[i - 1], x) + 4*x*v[i - 2]); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
Proved properties
-
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-94133232adc31a68 -
Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 0: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-94133232adc31a68 -
Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 0, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-94133232adc31a68
Proof chains
1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON
-
gamma_polynomial scale 1, shift 0
e-94133232adc31a68Gamma criterion RealRooted IsGammaExpansion.isRealRooted_and_hasRootsNonpos_iff ?
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle T(n, k) = (m*(n-k) + 1)*T(n-1, k-1) + (m*(k-1) + 1)*T(n-1, k) + j*T(n-2, k-1), where T(n, 1) = T(n, n) = 1, m …
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
theorem_check liu_wang_derivative_lag
e-f9fe2d240d80ec70root: theorem checkLiu–Wang theorem with a lag row [LW07, Thm 2.1] RealRooted ?
-
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle T(n, k) = (m*(n-k) + 1)*T(n-1, k-1) + (m*(k-1) + 1)*T(n-1, k) + j*T(n-2, k-1), where T(n, 1) = T(n, n) = 1, m …
Related sequences ?
No candidate equalities or related sequences.
References
- [LW07] Lily L. Liu and Yi Wang. A unified approach to polynomial sequences with only real zeros. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 38(4):542–560, May 2007. doi:10.1016/j.aam.2006.02.003