A124038: Triangle read by rows: T(n, k) = T(n-1, k-1) - T(n-2, k), with T(n, n) = 1, T(n, n-1) = -2.
Proved for all n: all roots real, in (−2, 3) · interlacing · basis map preserves real roots what this means
Rows ?
| n | x0 | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | x8 | x9 | x10 | x11 | x12 | x13 | x14 | Pn(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| 1 | -2 | 1 | -1 | |||||||||||||
| 2 | -1 | -2 | 1 | -2 | ||||||||||||
| 3 | 2 | -2 | -2 | 1 | -1 | |||||||||||
| 4 | 1 | 4 | -3 | -2 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||
| 5 | -2 | 3 | 6 | -4 | -2 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
| 6 | -1 | -6 | 6 | 8 | -5 | -2 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| 7 | 2 | -4 | -12 | 10 | 10 | -6 | -2 | 1 | -1 | |||||||
| 8 | 1 | 8 | -10 | -20 | 15 | 12 | -7 | -2 | 1 | -2 | ||||||
| 9 | -2 | 5 | 20 | -20 | -30 | 21 | 14 | -8 | -2 | 1 | -1 | |||||
| 10 | -1 | -10 | 15 | 40 | -35 | -42 | 28 | 16 | -9 | -2 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| 11 | 2 | -6 | -30 | 35 | 70 | -56 | -56 | 36 | 18 | -10 | -2 | 1 | 2 | |||
| 12 | 1 | 12 | -21 | -70 | 70 | 112 | -84 | -72 | 45 | 20 | -11 | -2 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 13 | -2 | 7 | 42 | -56 | -140 | 126 | 168 | -120 | -90 | 55 | 22 | -12 | -2 | 1 | -1 | |
| 14 | -1 | -14 | 28 | 112 | -126 | -252 | 210 | 240 | -165 | -110 | 66 | 24 | -13 | -2 | 1 | -2 |
Generated b-files: A124038 ?
Computed in your browser ?
Technical details
- Node id
n-4ca7e225b5e9bcc6· revision 1 · JSON- Definition source
oeis_catalog:A124038- Fingerprint
f6-17560ac5ecfb8518
Observed on the stored rows ?
- Degrees: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 (affine: slope 1, intercept 0)
- Palindromic rows: no
- γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
- Nonnegative coefficients (
nonn): no - Only rational roots (
rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no
OEIS matches ?
- A122876: row sums, 15 terms agree (row-sum match: finite agreement only) · view at the OEIS
- A100051: row sums, 15 terms agree (row-sum match: finite agreement only) · view at the OEIS
- A087204: row sums, 15 terms agree (row-sum match: finite agreement only) · view at the OEIS
- A124038: triangle, 66 terms agree, 11 full rows row-aligned (tabl) in polytool catalog · view at the OEIS · generated b-file 990 terms from n = 0 ?
- A057079: row sums, 15 terms agree (row-sum match: finite agreement only) · view at the OEIS
A generated b-file is computed from the node's definition along the row alignment of its OEIS link and starts at the entry's offset. It is an identification on a finite prefix, not a proof that the node and the OEIS entry agree for every n.
OEIS submission text ?
Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula
%F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows.
For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched;
the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a
finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.
The atlas's own rows: n = 0, …, ascending powers of x
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 0: 1; 1: -2, 1; 2: -1, -2, 1; 3: 2, -2, -2, 1; 4: 1, 4, -3, -2, 1; 5: -2, 3, 6, -4, -2, 1; 6: -1, -6, 6, 8, -5, -2, 1; 7: 2, -4, -12, 10, 10, -6, -2, 1; 8: 1, 8, -10, -20, 15, 12, -7, -2, 1; 9: -2, 5, 20, -20, -30, 21, 14, -8, -2, 1;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy P(n,x) = x*P(n-1,x) - P(n-2,x) for n >= 2, with P(0,x) = 1, P(1,x) = -2 + x.
%t MathematicaP[0, x_] := 1;
P[1, x_] := -2 + x;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[x*P[n - 1, x] - P[n - 2, x]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 1; v[2] = -2 + x; for(n = 2, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = x*v[i - 1] - v[i - 2]); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
A124038: triangle, offset 0, from the row P0
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 0: 1; 1: -2, 1; 2: -1, -2, 1; 3: 2, -2, -2, 1; 4: 1, 4, -3, -2, 1; 5: -2, 3, 6, -4, -2, 1; 6: -1, -6, 6, 8, -5, -2, 1; 7: 2, -4, -12, 10, 10, -6, -2, 1; 8: 1, 8, -10, -20, 15, 12, -7, -2, 1; 9: -2, 5, 20, -20, -30, 21, 14, -8, -2, 1;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy P(n,x) = x*P(n-1,x) - P(n-2,x) for n >= 2, with P(0,x) = 1, P(1,x) = -2 + x.
%t MathematicaP[0, x_] := 1;
P[1, x_] := -2 + x;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[x*P[n - 1, x] - P[n - 2, x]];
Table[PadRight[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], n + 1], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 1; v[2] = -2 + x; for(n = 2, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = x*v[i - 1] - v[i - 2]); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c = concat(c, vector(n + 1 - #c)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
Proved properties
-
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, +inf)
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-66ab36c44d35dd53 -
Interlacing of consecutive rows. Rows P_(m-1), P_m interlace (strict, previous interlaces next) for every m >= 1
The roots of consecutive polynomials alternate on the real line.by the cited steps:
e-66ab36c44d35dd53,e-cf11db18e382a69a -
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-2, 3)
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-cf11db18e382a69a -
Basis map preserves real-rootedness. Basis map u^k -> P_k sends roots in [-1, 1] to roots in (-inf, +inf): every real polynomial with all roots in E = [-1, 1] has a real-rooted image
The linear map sending x^k to the k-th polynomial of the sequence turns polynomials with roots in one interval into real-rooted ones.by the cited steps:
e-c628eede86362da4
Proof chains
3 incoming proof steps. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON
-
basis_map_theorem
e-c628eede86362da4root: theorem checkAffine-current basis map theorem polytool RealRooted orderTwoConstants_nonneg_iff ?
-
theorem_check three_term_recurrence
e-66ab36c44d35dd53root: theorem checkThree-term recurrence criterion [Sze39, §3.3; Fav35] polytool ?
-
theorem_check three_term_recurrence
e-cf11db18e382a69aroot: theorem checkThree-term recurrence criterion [Sze39, §3.3; Fav35] polytool ?
Used in 3 proof steps
e-480f02718c8257dfpreserver_image (affine, shift 0) → shift_x_plus_one of Triangle read by rows: T(n, k) = T(n-1, k-1) - T(n-2, k), with T(n, n…e-66ea761efe9838f4preserver_image (derivative_polynomial, shift 0) → derivative of Triangle read by rows: T(n, k) = T(n-1, k-1) - T(n-2, k), with T(n, n) = 1,…e-fa558ee223516e16preserver_image (derivative_polynomial, shift 0) → one_plus_derivative of Triangle read by rows: T(n, k) = T(n-1, k-1) - T(n-2, k), with T(n…
Related sequences ?
No candidate equalities or related sequences.
References
- [Fav35] Jean Favard. Sur les polynômes de tchebicheff. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 200:2052–2053, 1935.
- [Sze39] G. Szegő. Orthogonal Polynomials. Colloquium publications, American Mathematical Society, 1939. doi:10.1090/coll/023