A122542 → D

OEIS matches ?

• A119915: row sums, 15 terms agree OEIS nonn (row-sum match: finite agreement only) · view at the OEIS · generated b-file 200 terms from n = 0 ?

A generated b-file is computed from the node's definition along the row alignment of its OEIS link and starts at the entry's offset. It is an identification on a finite prefix, not a proof that the node and the OEIS entry agree for every n.

OEIS submission text ?

Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula %F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows. For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched; the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.

Triangle begins:
   1: 0;
   2: 1;
   3: 2,  2;
   4: 2,  8,   3;
   5: 2, 16,  18,    4;
   6: 2, 24,  54,   32,    5;
   7: 2, 32, 114,  128,   50,    6;
   8: 2, 40, 198,  352,  250,   72,   7;
   9: 2, 48, 306,  768,  850,  432,  98,   8;
  10: 2, 56, 438, 1440, 2250, 1752, 686, 128, 9;

The row polynomials satisfy P(n,x) = -x^2*P(n-4,x) - (2*x+2*x^2)*P(n-3,x) - (1+x^2)*P(n-2,x) + (2+2*x)*P(n-1,x) for n >= 5, with P(1,x) = 0, P(2,x) = 1, P(3,x) = 2 + 2*x, P(4,x) = 2 + 8*x + 3*x^2.

P[1, x_] := 0;
P[2, x_] := 1;
P[3, x_] := 2 + 2*x;
P[4, x_] := 2 + 8*x + 3*x^2;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[-x^2*P[n - 4, x] - (2*x + 2*x^2)*P[n - 3, x] - (1 + x^2)*P[n - 2, x] + (2 + 2*x)*P[n - 1, x]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 1, 10}] // Flatten

P(N) = {my(v = vector(N)); v[1] = 0; v[2] = 1; v[3] = 2 + 2*x; v[4] = 2 + 8*x + 3*x^2; for(n = 5, N, my(i = n); v[i] = -x^2*v[i - 4] - (2*x + 2*x^2)*v[i - 3] - (1 + x^2)*v[i - 2] + (2 + 2*x)*v[i - 1]); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i, v[i])))};
T(10)

Proved properties

• Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 1, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
  Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.
  by the cited steps: e-a631bbcd56a33e16
• Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 1: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
  All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).
  derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem: e-a631bbcd56a33e16
• Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 1, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
  Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.
  derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem: e-a631bbcd56a33e16
• Interlacing of consecutive rows. Rows P_(m-1), P_m interlace (weak, unordered) for every m >= 2
  The roots of consecutive polynomials alternate on the real line.
  by the cited steps: e-a631bbcd56a33e16

Proof chains

1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON

• preserver_image derivative_polynomial, shift 0 e-a631bbcd56a33e16

  Laguerre’s theorem on differential operators [SP14] polytool ?

  • premise (sequence): Triangle T(n,k), 0 <= k <= n, read by rows, given by [0, 2, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, ...] DELTA [1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, ...]…
    uses: Every row P_n, n >= 1, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
    • theorem_check liu_wang_derivative_lag e-e90fe0b3eba80839 root: theorem check

      Liu–Wang theorem with a lag row [LW07, Thm 2.1] RealRooted ?

Related sequences ?

Same fingerprint (1)

Equal up to content, sign, reversal and a small index shift.

• A113413 → θ+1

References

1. [LW07] Lily L. Liu and Yi Wang. A unified approach to polynomial sequences with only real zeros. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 38(4):542–560, May 2007. doi:10.1016/j.aam.2006.02.003
2. [SP14] J Schur and G Polya. Über zwei Arten von Faktorenfolgen in der Theorie der algebraischen Gleichungen. J. Reine Angew. Math., 1914.