A137320 → reverse
nonnegative coefficients only rational roots
Proved for all n: all roots real, in (−∞, 0] · coefficients of one sign · Hadamard kernel what this means
Rows ?
| n | x0 | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | Pn(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| 2 | 4 | 2 | 6 | |||||
| 3 | 8 | 12 | 4 | 24 | ||||
| 4 | 16 | 48 | 44 | 12 | 120 | |||
| 5 | 32 | 160 | 280 | 200 | 48 | 720 | ||
| 6 | 64 | 480 | 1360 | 1800 | 1096 | 240 | 5040 | |
| 7 | 128 | 1344 | 5600 | 11760 | 12992 | 7056 | 1440 | 40320 |
Generated b-files: A125553 (reversed triangle) ?
Computed in your browser ?
Technical details
- Node id
n-3df3926aefc1fd76· revision 1 · JSON- Definition source
derived:reversal- Fingerprint
f6-21d4cbc8ebff768c
Observed on the stored rows ?
- Degrees: 0, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 (irregular)
- Palindromic rows: no
- γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
- Nonnegative coefficients (
nonn): yes - Only rational roots (
rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): yes
OEIS matches ?
- A370360: row sums, 15 terms agree OEIS nonn (row-sum match: finite agreement only) · view at the OEIS
- A358185: row sums, 15 terms agree (row-sum match: finite agreement only) · view at the OEIS
- A000142: row sums, 15 terms agree OEIS nonn (row-sum match: finite agreement only) · view at the OEIS
- A159333: row sums, 15 terms agree (row-sum match: finite agreement only) · view at the OEIS
- A104150: row sums, 15 terms agree OEIS nonn (row-sum match: finite agreement only) · view at the OEIS
- A124355: row sums, 14 terms agree OEIS nonn (row-sum match: finite agreement only) · view at the OEIS
- A125553: reversed triangle, 45 terms agree, 9 full rows row-aligned (tabl) OEIS nonn · view at the OEIS · generated b-file 990 terms from n = 1 ?
- A354074: row sums, 13 terms agree OEIS nonn (row-sum match: finite agreement only) · view at the OEIS
- A338112: row sums, 13 terms agree OEIS nonn (row-sum match: finite agreement only) · view at the OEIS
A generated b-file is computed from the node's definition along the row alignment of its OEIS link and starts at the entry's offset. It is an identification on a finite prefix, not a proof that the node and the OEIS entry agree for every n.
OEIS submission text ?
Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula
%F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows.
For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched;
the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a
finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.
The atlas's own rows: n = 0, …, ascending powers of x
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 0: 1; 1: 2; 2: 4, 2; 3: 8, 12, 4; 4: 16, 48, 44, 12; 5: 32, 160, 280, 200, 48; 6: 64, 480, 1360, 1800, 1096, 240; 7: 128, 1344, 5600, 11760, 12992, 7056, 1440; 8: 256, 3584, 20608, 62720, 108304, 105056, 52272, 10080; 9: 512, 9216, 69888, 290304, 718368, 1076544, 944992, 438336, 80640;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy P(n,x) = (2+(n-1)*x)*P(n-1,x) for n >= 1, with P(0,x) = 1.
%t MathematicaP[0, x_] := 1;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[(2 + (n - 1)*x)*P[n - 1, x]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 1; for(n = 1, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = (2 + (n - 1)*x)*v[i - 1]); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
A125553: reversed triangle, offset 1, from the row P1
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 1: 2; 2: 2, 4; 3: 4, 12, 8; 4: 12, 44, 48, 16; 5: 48, 200, 280, 160, 32; 6: 240, 1096, 1800, 1360, 480, 64; 7: 1440, 7056, 12992, 11760, 5600, 1344, 128; 8: 10080, 52272, 105056, 108304, 62720, 20608, 3584, 256; 9: 80640, 438336, 944992, 1076544, 718368, 290304, 69888, 9216, 512; 10: 725760, 4106304, 9381600, 11578880, 8618400, 4049472, 1209600, 222720, 23040, 1024;
%F FormulaRow n lists the coefficients of P(n,x) in descending powers of x, where P(n,x) = (2+(n-1)*x)*P(n-1,x) for n >= 2, with P(1,x) = 2.
%t MathematicaP[1, x_] := 2;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[(2 + (n - 1)*x)*P[n - 1, x]];
Table[Reverse[PadRight[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], n]], {n, 1, 10}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N)); v[1] = 2; for(n = 2, N, my(i = n); v[i] = (2 + (n - 1)*x)*v[i - 1]); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c = concat(c, vector(n - #c)); c = Vecrev(c); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i, v[i])))};
T(10)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
Proved properties
-
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-a28ae8b138b0cf1e -
Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 0: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-a28ae8b138b0cf1e -
Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 0, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-a28ae8b138b0cf1e
Proof chains
1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON
-
preserver_image reversal, shift 0
e-a28ae8b138b0cf1eAffine, reversal and Möbius substitutions (elementary) polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
Coefficients of raising factorial polynomials, T(n,k) = [x^k] p(x, n) where p(x, n) = (m*x + n - 1)*p(x, n - 1) with p[…
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
parent_provers root_domain
e-6aa1e3cc7e408461root: theorem checkParent-row provers of polytool polytool ?
-
-
premise (sequence):
Coefficients of raising factorial polynomials, T(n,k) = [x^k] p(x, n) where p(x, n) = (m*x + n - 1)*p(x, n - 1) with p[…
Related sequences ?
Same fingerprint (3)
Equal up to content, sign, reversal and a small index shift.