A143683 → θ+1
nonnegative coefficients
Proved for all n: all roots real, in (−∞, 0] · coefficients of one sign · interlacing (weak) · Hadamard kernel what this means
Rows ?
| n | x0 | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | Pn(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||||
| 2 | 1 | 20 | 3 | 24 | |||||
| 3 | 1 | 38 | 57 | 4 | 100 | ||||
| 4 | 1 | 56 | 354 | 112 | 5 | 528 | |||
| 5 | 1 | 74 | 894 | 1192 | 185 | 6 | 2352 | ||
| 6 | 1 | 92 | 1677 | 6160 | 2795 | 276 | 7 | 11008 | |
| 7 | 1 | 110 | 2703 | 17932 | 22415 | 5406 | 385 | 8 | 48960 |
Computed in your browser ?
Technical details
- Node id
n-344833a32d1afc96· revision 1 · JSON- Definition source
derived:theta_plus_one- Fingerprint
f6-4da4a97ce74eee20
Observed on the stored rows ?
- Degrees: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 (affine: slope 1, intercept 0)
- Palindromic rows: no
- γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
- Nonnegative coefficients (
nonn): yes - Only rational roots (
rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no
OEIS matches ?
No OEIS matches.
OEIS submission text ?
Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula
%F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows.
For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched;
the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a
finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.
The atlas's own rows: n = 0, …, ascending powers of x
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 0: 1; 1: 1, 2; 2: 1, 20, 3; 3: 1, 38, 57, 4; 4: 1, 56, 354, 112, 5; 5: 1, 74, 894, 1192, 185, 6; 6: 1, 92, 1677, 6160, 2795, 276, 7; 7: 1, 110, 2703, 17932, 22415, 5406, 385, 8; 8: 1, 128, 3972, 39424, 106430, 59136, 9268, 512, 9; 9: 1, 146, 5484, 73552, 335030, 402036, 128716, 14624, 657, 10;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy -(n+(9*n^2-2*n)*x-(9*n^2+17*n)*x^2)*P(n,x) = -(n+(9*n^2+34*n-34)*x+(153*n^2+127*n-292)*x^2-(18*n+34)*x^3)*P(n-1,x) + (x+(9*n+51)*x^2+(306*n+579)*x^3+(9*n+17)*x^4)*d/dx P(n-1,x) for n >= 1, with P(0,x) = 1.
%t MathematicaP[0, x_] := 1;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[Together[(-(n + (9*n^2 + 34*n - 34)*x + (153*n^2 + 127*n - 292)*x^2 - (18*n + 34)*x^3)*P[n - 1, x] + (x + (9*n + 51)*x^2 + (306*n + 579)*x^3 + (9*n + 17)*x^4)*D[P[n - 1, x], x])/(-n - (9*n^2 - 2*n)*x + (9*n^2 + 17*n)*x^2)]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 1; for(n = 1, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = (-(n + (9*n^2 + 34*n - 34)*x + (153*n^2 + 127*n - 292)*x^2 - (18*n + 34)*x^3)*v[i - 1] + (x + (9*n + 51)*x^2 + (306*n + 579)*x^3 + (9*n + 17)*x^4)*deriv(v[i - 1], x))/(-n - (9*n^2 - 2*n)*x + (9*n^2 + 17*n)*x^2)); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
Proved properties
-
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-bf7cc7e5e6b812c4 -
Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 0: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-bf7cc7e5e6b812c4 -
Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 0, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-bf7cc7e5e6b812c4 -
Interlacing of consecutive rows. Rows P_(m-1), P_m interlace (weak, unordered) for every m >= 1
The roots of consecutive polynomials alternate on the real line.by the cited steps:
e-bf7cc7e5e6b812c4
Proof chains
1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON
-
preserver_image euler_polynomial, shift 0
e-bf7cc7e5e6b812c4Laguerre’s theorem on multiplier sequences [SP14; Bra15, Thm 40] polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
Pascal-(1,8,1) array.
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
theorem_check liu_wang_derivative_lag
e-a922c934805482beroot: theorem checkLiu–Wang theorem with a lag row [LW07, Thm 2.1] RealRooted ?
-
preserver_image reversal, shift 0
e-e737400fb7cbaf29Affine, reversal and Möbius substitutions (elementary) polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
Pascal-(1,8,1) array.
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
premise (sequence):
Pascal-(1,8,1) array.
-
-
premise (sequence):
Pascal-(1,8,1) array.
Related sequences ?
No candidate equalities or related sequences.
References
- [Bra15] Petter Brändén. Unimodality, log-concavity, real-rootedness and beyond. Handbook of enumerative combinatorics, :437–483, March 2015. doi:10.1201/b18255-10
- [LW07] Lily L. Liu and Yi Wang. A unified approach to polynomial sequences with only real zeros. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 38(4):542–560, May 2007. doi:10.1016/j.aam.2006.02.003
- [SP14] J Schur and G Polya. Über zwei Arten von Faktorenfolgen in der Theorie der algebraischen Gleichungen. J. Reine Angew. Math., 1914.