A256890 → Pₙ + Pₙ₊₁
nonnegative coefficients
Proved for all n: all roots real what this means
Rows ?
| n | x0 | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | x8 | x9 | x10 | Pn(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | 64 | 56 | 8 | 140 | |||||||
| 2 | 24 | 248 | 468 | 204 | 16 | 960 | ||||||
| 3 | 48 | 880 | 3060 | 2840 | 700 | 32 | 7560 | |||||
| 4 | 96 | 2960 | 17324 | 29084 | 15364 | 2308 | 64 | 67200 | ||||
| 5 | 192 | 9616 | 89332 | 246720 | 234960 | 76928 | 7404 | 128 | 665280 | |||
| 6 | 384 | 30512 | 431980 | 1844244 | 2863640 | 1698616 | 364668 | 23300 | 256 | 7257600 | ||
| 7 | 768 | 95248 | 1995188 | 12602408 | 29871268 | 28851872 | 11335772 | 1661032 | 72332 | 512 | 86486400 | |
| 8 | 1536 | 293936 | 8910060 | 80611404 | 278422908 | 408418620 | 262173444 | 71270820 | 7344276 | 222372 | 1024 | 1117670400 |
Computed in your browser ?
Technical details
- Node id
n-27362268d8aab8aa· revision 1 · JSON- Definition source
derived:obreschkoff_combination- Fingerprint
f6-083d1a47ae232abf
Observed on the stored rows ?
- Degrees: 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 (affine: slope 1, intercept 2)
- Palindromic rows: no
- γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
- Nonnegative coefficients (
nonn): yes - Only rational roots (
rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no
OEIS matches ?
No OEIS matches.
OEIS submission text ?
Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula
%F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows.
For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched;
the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a
finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.
The atlas's own rows: n = 1, …, ascending powers of x
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 1: 12, 64, 56, 8; 2: 24, 248, 468, 204, 16; 3: 48, 880, 3060, 2840, 700, 32; 4: 96, 2960, 17324, 29084, 15364, 2308, 64; 5: 192, 9616, 89332, 246720, 234960, 76928, 7404, 128; 6: 384, 30512, 431980, 1844244, 2863640, 1698616, 364668, 23300, 256; 7: 768, 95248, 1995188, 12602408, 29871268, 28851872, 11335772, 1661032, 72332, 512; 8: 1536, 293936, 8910060, 80611404, 278422908, 408418620, 262173444, 71270820, 7344276, 222372, 1024; 9: 3072, 899728, 38801460, 490519760, 2385061640, 5059085696, 4929089984, 2203499600, 428159000, 31751120, 678892, 2048; 10: 6144, 2738096, 165780716, 2872142660, 19145934480, 56627959632, 79524214728, 54083931288, 17432954640, 2482785120, 134929324, 2062276, 4096;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy P(n,x) = (2+(n+1)*x)*P(n-2,x) + (x-x^2)*d/dx P(n-2,x) + (1+(n+3)*x)*P(n-1,x) + (x-x^2)*d/dx P(n-1,x) for n >= 3, with P(1,x) = 12 + 64*x + 56*x^2 + 8*x^3, P(2,x) = 24 + 248*x + 468*x^2 + 204*x^3 + 16*x^4.
%t MathematicaP[1, x_] := 12 + 64*x + 56*x^2 + 8*x^3;
P[2, x_] := 24 + 248*x + 468*x^2 + 204*x^3 + 16*x^4;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[(2 + (n + 1)*x)*P[n - 2, x] + (x - x^2)*D[P[n - 2, x], x] + (1 + (n + 3)*x)*P[n - 1, x] + (x - x^2)*D[P[n - 1, x], x]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 1, 10}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N)); v[1] = 12 + 64*x + 56*x^2 + 8*x^3; v[2] = 24 + 248*x + 468*x^2 + 204*x^3 + 16*x^4; for(n = 3, N, my(i = n); v[i] = (2 + (n + 1)*x)*v[i - 2] + (x - x^2)*deriv(v[i - 2], x) + (1 + (n + 3)*x)*v[i - 1] + (x - x^2)*deriv(v[i - 1], x)); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i, v[i])))};
T(10)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
Proved properties
-
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 1, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, +inf)
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-a7f8a3dfd72049c9
Proof chains
1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON
-
obreschkoff_combination
e-a7f8a3dfd72049c9Hermite–Kakeya–Obreschkoff theorem [Obr63; Fis06, Thm 1.43] ?
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle T(n,k) = t(n-k, k); t(n,m) = f(m)*t(n-1,m) + f(n)*t(n,m-1), where f(x) = x + 2.
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 1, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, +inf)
-
theorem_check liu_wang
e-072c1088d2b33d0aroot: theorem checkLiu–Wang theorem [LW07, Thm 2.1, Cor 2.4] ?
-
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle T(n,k) = t(n-k, k); t(n,m) = f(m)*t(n-1,m) + f(n)*t(n,m-1), where f(x) = x + 2.
uses: Rows P_(m-1), P_m interlace (weak, unordered) for every m >= 2no recorded property covers this requirement
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle T(n,k) = t(n-k, k); t(n,m) = f(m)*t(n-1,m) + f(n)*t(n,m-1), where f(x) = x + 2.
Related sequences ?
No candidate equalities or related sequences.
References
- [Fis06] Steve Fisk. Polynomials, roots, and interlacing. arXiv:math/0612833. arXiv
- [LW07] Lily L. Liu and Yi Wang. A unified approach to polynomial sequences with only real zeros. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 38(4):542–560, May 2007. doi:10.1016/j.aam.2006.02.003
- [Obr63] Nikola Obreschkoff. Verteilung und berechnung der nullstellen reeller polynome. Hochschulbücher für mathematik, VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, 1963.