A114655 → x ↦ x+1

nonnegative coefficients

Proved for all n: all roots real, in (−∞, −1] · coefficients of one sign · interlacing (weak) · Hadamard kernel what this means

Recurrence
\(\left(1 + n\right)\,P_{n}(x) = \left(-1 - 3\,x + 5\,n + 3\,n x\right)\,P_{n-1}(x) + \left(2 - 2\,x^{2}\right)\,P_{n-1}'(x)\)
\(P_{1}(x) = 2\)

Rows ?

nx0x1x2x3x4x5x6x7Pn(1)
122
2628
32216240
490102302224
53946082924821344
61806353023806607028448
7855820256176707040129096254912
841586115598124026650301743022821262366080

Computed in your browser ?

Technical details
Node id
n-25065a706ad43d32 · revision 1 · JSON
Definition source
derived:shift_x_plus_one
Fingerprint
f6-c8aa5aaa0c2f2cd0

Observed on the stored rows ?

  • Degrees: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 (affine: slope 1, intercept -1)
  • Palindromic rows: no
  • γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
  • Nonnegative coefficients (nonn): yes
  • Only rational roots (rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no

OEIS matches ?

OEIS submission text ?

Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula %F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows. For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched; the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.

The atlas's own rows: n = 1, …, ascending powers of x
%e Example
Triangle begins:
   1:       2;
   2:       6,       2;
   3:      22,      16,       2;
   4:      90,     102,      30,       2;
   5:     394,     608,     292,      48,       2;
   6:    1806,    3530,    2380,     660,      70,      2;
   7:    8558,   20256,   17670,    7040,    1290,     96,     2;
   8:   41586,  115598,  124026,   65030,   17430,   2282,   126,    2;
   9:  206098,  658048,  839048,  548128,  196028,  38080,  3752,  160,   2;
  10: 1037718, 3742290, 5532120, 4338600, 1954260, 512316, 75768, 5832, 198, 2;
%F Formula
The row polynomials satisfy (n+1)*P(n,x) = (5*n-1+(3*n-3)*x)*P(n-1,x) + (2-2*x^2)*d/dx P(n-1,x) for n >= 2, with P(1,x) = 2.
%t Mathematica
P[1, x_] := 2;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[Together[((5*n - 1 + (3*n - 3)*x)*P[n - 1, x] + (2 - 2*x^2)*D[P[n - 1, x], x])/(n + 1)]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 1, 10}] // Flatten
%o PARI/GP
P(N) = {my(v = vector(N)); v[1] = 2; for(n = 2, N, my(i = n); v[i] = ((5*n - 1 + (3*n - 3)*x)*v[i - 1] + (2 - 2*x^2)*deriv(v[i - 1], x))/(n + 1)); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i, v[i])))};
T(10)

Generated with polytool c48629374597.

Proved properties

  • Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 1, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, -1]
    Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.
    by the cited steps: e-5ebd2cd7e542e718
  • Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 1: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
    All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).
    derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem: e-5ebd2cd7e542e718
  • Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 1, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
    Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.
    derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem: e-5ebd2cd7e542e718
  • Interlacing of consecutive rows. Rows P_(m-1), P_m interlace (weak, unordered) for every m >= 2
    The roots of consecutive polynomials alternate on the real line.
    by the cited steps: e-5ebd2cd7e542e718

Proof chains

1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON

Same fingerprint (2)

Equal up to content, sign, reversal and a small index shift.

References

  1. [LW07] Lily L. Liu and Yi Wang. A unified approach to polynomial sequences with only real zeros. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 38(4):542–560, May 2007. doi:10.1016/j.aam.2006.02.003