A086645 → x ↦ x/(x+1)
nonnegative coefficients
Proved for all n: all roots real, in [−1, 0] · coefficients of one sign · Hadamard kernel what this means
Rows ?
| n | x0 | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | Pn(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||||
| 3 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 17 | |||||
| 4 | 1 | 18 | 48 | 32 | 99 | ||||
| 5 | 1 | 32 | 160 | 256 | 128 | 577 | |||
| 6 | 1 | 50 | 400 | 1120 | 1280 | 512 | 3363 | ||
| 7 | 1 | 72 | 840 | 3584 | 6912 | 6144 | 2048 | 19601 | |
| 8 | 1 | 98 | 1568 | 9408 | 26880 | 39424 | 28672 | 8192 | 114243 |
Generated b-files: A001541 (row sums) ?
Computed in your browser ?
Technical details
- Node id
n-2436ff88ce72c273· revision 1 · JSON- Definition source
derived:mobius_x_over_x_plus_one- Fingerprint
f6-607690c148a1ebbd
Observed on the stored rows ?
- Degrees: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 (affine: slope 1, intercept -1)
- Palindromic rows: no
- γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
- Nonnegative coefficients (
nonn): yes - Only rational roots (
rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no
OEIS matches ?
- A001541: row sums, 15 terms agree OEIS nonn (row-sum match: finite agreement only) · view at the OEIS · generated b-file 200 terms from n = 0 ?
A generated b-file is computed from the node's definition along the row alignment of its OEIS link and starts at the entry's offset. It is an identification on a finite prefix, not a proof that the node and the OEIS entry agree for every n.
OEIS submission text ?
Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula
%F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows.
For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched;
the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a
finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.
The atlas's own rows: n = 1, …, ascending powers of x
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 1: 1; 2: 1, 2; 3: 1, 8, 8; 4: 1, 18, 48, 32; 5: 1, 32, 160, 256, 128; 6: 1, 50, 400, 1120, 1280, 512; 7: 1, 72, 840, 3584, 6912, 6144, 2048; 8: 1, 98, 1568, 9408, 26880, 39424, 28672, 8192; 9: 1, 128, 2688, 21504, 84480, 180224, 212992, 131072, 32768; 10: 1, 162, 4320, 44352, 228096, 658944, 1118208, 1105920, 589824, 131072;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy (n-2+(2*n-4)*x+(n-2)*x^2)*P(n,x) = (n-2+(4*n-8)*x+(5*n-10)*x^2+(2*n-4)*x^3)*P(n-1,x) + (2*x+6*x^2+6*x^3+2*x^4)*d/dx P(n-1,x) for n >= 3, with P(1,x) = 1, P(2,x) = 1 + 2*x.
%t MathematicaP[1, x_] := 1;
P[2, x_] := 1 + 2*x;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[Together[((n - 2 + (4*n - 8)*x + (5*n - 10)*x^2 + (2*n - 4)*x^3)*P[n - 1, x] + (2*x + 6*x^2 + 6*x^3 + 2*x^4)*D[P[n - 1, x], x])/(n - 2 + (2*n - 4)*x + (n - 2)*x^2)]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 1, 10}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N)); v[1] = 1; v[2] = 1 + 2*x; for(n = 3, N, my(i = n); v[i] = ((n - 2 + (4*n - 8)*x + (5*n - 10)*x^2 + (2*n - 4)*x^3)*v[i - 1] + (2*x + 6*x^2 + 6*x^3 + 2*x^4)*deriv(v[i - 1], x))/(n - 2 + (2*n - 4)*x + (n - 2)*x^2)); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i, v[i])))};
T(10)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
Proved properties
-
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 1, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in [-1, 0]
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-89eebc248f8c6d71 -
Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 1: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-89eebc248f8c6d71 -
Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 1, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-89eebc248f8c6d71
Proof chains
1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON
-
preserver_image mobius, shift 0
e-89eebc248f8c6d71Affine, reversal and Möbius substitutions (elementary) polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle read by rows: T(n, k) = binomial(2n, 2k).
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 1, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
theorem_check three_term_recurrence
e-1375f2f1a11f9809root: theorem checkThree-term recurrence criterion [Sze39, §3.3; Fav35] polytool ?
-
preserver_image reversal, shift 0
e-a5e3cd5a8b6d6a1aAffine, reversal and Möbius substitutions (elementary) polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle read by rows: T(n, k) = binomial(2n, 2k).
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 1, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle read by rows: T(n, k) = binomial(2n, 2k).
-
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle read by rows: T(n, k) = binomial(2n, 2k).
Related sequences ?
Same fingerprint (1)
Equal up to content, sign, reversal and a small index shift.
References
- [Fav35] Jean Favard. Sur les polynômes de tchebicheff. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 200:2052–2053, 1935.
- [Sze39] G. Szegő. Orthogonal Polynomials. Colloquium publications, American Mathematical Society, 1939. doi:10.1090/coll/023