A257617 → γ
nonnegative coefficients
Proved for all n: all roots real, in (−∞, 0] · coefficients of one sign · Hadamard kernel what this means
Rows ?
| n | x0 | x1 | x2 | x3 | Pn(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1 | 2 | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4 | 28 | 32 | ||
| 3 | 8 | 364 | 372 | ||
| 4 | 16 | 3612 | 5096 | 8724 | |
| 5 | 32 | 33404 | 182672 | 216108 | |
| 6 | 64 | 302876 | 4325720 | 2557408 | 7186068 |
| 7 | 128 | 2731260 | 86172576 | 179940544 | 268844508 |
Computed in your browser ?
Technical details
- Node id
n-17beece5afed09d4· revision 1 · JSON- Definition source
derived:gamma_polynomial- Fingerprint
f6-684610525c4cebed
Observed on the stored rows ?
- Degrees: 0, 0, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5, 5, 6, 6, 7 (half affine: slope 1, intercept 0)
- Palindromic rows: no
- γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
- Nonnegative coefficients (
nonn): yes - Only rational roots (
rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no
OEIS matches ?
No OEIS matches.
OEIS submission text ?
Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula
%F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows.
For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched;
the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a
finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.
The atlas's own rows: n = 0, …, ascending powers of x
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 0: 1; 1: 2; 2: 4, 28; 3: 8, 364; 4: 16, 3612, 5096; 5: 32, 33404, 182672; 6: 64, 302876, 4325720, 2557408; 7: 128, 2731260, 86172576, 179940544; 8: 256, 24593884, 1569949416, 7757880704, 2519167616; 9: 512, 221373628, 27185076912, 266348423488, 292795688192;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy P(n,x) = (2+(14*n-14)*x)*P(n-1,x) + (7*x-28*x^2)*d/dx P(n-1,x) for n >= 1, with P(0,x) = 1.
%t MathematicaP[0, x_] := 1;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[(2 + (14*n - 14)*x)*P[n - 1, x] + (7*x - 28*x^2)*D[P[n - 1, x], x]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 1; for(n = 1, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = (2 + (14*n - 14)*x)*v[i - 1] + (7*x - 28*x^2)*deriv(v[i - 1], x)); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
Proved properties
-
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-f8caac77b40c1335 -
Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 0: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-f8caac77b40c1335 -
Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 0, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-f8caac77b40c1335
Proof chains
1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON
-
gamma_polynomial scale 1, shift 0
e-f8caac77b40c1335Gamma criterion RealRooted IsGammaExpansion.isRealRooted_and_hasRootsNonpos_iff ?
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle read by rows: T(n,k) = t(n-k, k); t(n,m) = f(m)*t(n-1,m) + f(n)*t(n,m-1), where f(x) = 7*x + 2.
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
theorem_check liu_wang
e-f4ea85fa593cfea8root: theorem checkLiu–Wang theorem [LW07, Thm 2.1, Cor 2.4] ?
-
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle read by rows: T(n,k) = t(n-k, k); t(n,m) = f(m)*t(n-1,m) + f(n)*t(n,m-1), where f(x) = 7*x + 2.
Related sequences ?
No candidate equalities or related sequences.
References
- [LW07] Lily L. Liu and Yi Wang. A unified approach to polynomial sequences with only real zeros. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 38(4):542–560, May 2007. doi:10.1016/j.aam.2006.02.003