A062145 → x ↦ x+1

nonnegative coefficients

Proved for all n: all roots real, in (−∞, −1] · coefficients of one sign · interlacing (weak) · Hadamard kernel what this means

Recurrence
\(\left(-2 + n + n^{2}\right)\,P_{n}(x) = \left(2\,x + 2\,n + n x + 4\,n^{2} + 3\,n^{2} x\right)\,P_{n-1}(x) + \left(-x - x^{2} - 2\,n x - 2\,n x^{2}\right)\,P_{n-1}'(x)\)
\(P_{1}(x) = 1\)

Rows ?

nx0x1x2x3x4x5x6x7Pn(1)
111
2549
321301061
48416810520377
5330840756280352241
612873960462025206305613073
75005180182574018480693012608475517
8194488008013513512012060060166322310120433905

Generated b-files: A190666 (row sums) ?

Computed in your browser ?

Technical details
Node id
n-141ab74a8d7e58b7 · revision 1 · JSON
Definition source
derived:shift_x_plus_one
Fingerprint
f6-b9e11a0a9cd0a58e

Observed on the stored rows ?

  • Degrees: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 (affine: slope 1, intercept -1)
  • Palindromic rows: no
  • γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
  • Nonnegative coefficients (nonn): yes
  • Only rational roots (rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no

OEIS matches ?

A generated b-file is computed from the node's definition along the row alignment of its OEIS link and starts at the entry's offset. It is an identification on a finite prefix, not a proof that the node and the OEIS entry agree for every n.

OEIS submission text ?

Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula %F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows. For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched; the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.

The atlas's own rows: n = 1, …, ascending powers of x
%e Example
Triangle begins:
   1:      1;
   2:      5,       4;
   3:     21,      30,      10;
   4:     84,     168,     105,      20;
   5:    330,     840,     756,     280,      35;
   6:   1287,    3960,    4620,    2520,     630,      56;
   7:   5005,   18018,   25740,   18480,    6930,    1260,     84;
   8:  19448,   80080,  135135,  120120,   60060,   16632,   2310,   120;
   9:  75582,  350064,  680680,  720720,  450450,  168168,  36036,  3960,  165;
  10: 293930, 1511640, 3325608, 4084080, 3063060, 1441440, 420420, 72072, 6435, 220;
%F Formula
The row polynomials satisfy (n^2+n-2)*P(n,x) = (4*n^2+2*n+(3*n^2+n+2)*x)*P(n-1,x) - ((2*n+1)*x+(2*n+1)*x^2)*d/dx P(n-1,x) for n >= 2, with P(1,x) = 1.
%t Mathematica
P[1, x_] := 1;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[Together[((4*n^2 + 2*n + (3*n^2 + n + 2)*x)*P[n - 1, x] - ((2*n + 1)*x + (2*n + 1)*x^2)*D[P[n - 1, x], x])/(n^2 + n - 2)]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 1, 10}] // Flatten
%o PARI/GP
P(N) = {my(v = vector(N)); v[1] = 1; for(n = 2, N, my(i = n); v[i] = ((4*n^2 + 2*n + (3*n^2 + n + 2)*x)*v[i - 1] - ((2*n + 1)*x + (2*n + 1)*x^2)*deriv(v[i - 1], x))/(n^2 + n - 2)); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i, v[i])))};
T(10)

Generated with polytool c48629374597.

Proved properties

  • Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 1, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, -1]
    Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.
    by the cited steps: e-b5db2586a8a89c95
  • Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 1: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
    All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).
    derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem: e-b5db2586a8a89c95
  • Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 1, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
    Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.
    derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem: e-b5db2586a8a89c95
  • Interlacing of consecutive rows. Rows P_(m-1), P_m interlace (weak, unordered) for every m >= 2
    The roots of consecutive polynomials alternate on the real line.
    by the cited steps: e-b5db2586a8a89c95

Proof chains

1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON

No candidate equalities or related sequences.

References

  1. [LW07] Lily L. Liu and Yi Wang. A unified approach to polynomial sequences with only real zeros. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 38(4):542–560, May 2007. doi:10.1016/j.aam.2006.02.003