A008292 → γ (shift +1) → D+1
nonnegative coefficients
Proved for all n: all roots real, in (−∞, 0] · coefficients of one sign · Hadamard kernel what this means
Rows ?
| n | x0 | x1 | x2 | x3 | Pn(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2 | 3 | 2 | 5 | ||
| 3 | 9 | 8 | 17 | ||
| 4 | 23 | 54 | 16 | 93 | |
| 5 | 53 | 324 | 136 | 513 | |
| 6 | 115 | 1554 | 1536 | 272 | 3477 |
| 7 | 241 | 6384 | 14976 | 3968 | 25569 |
Computed in your browser ?
Technical details
- Node id
n-13e21c95e30deb17· revision 1 · JSON- Definition source
derived:one_plus_derivative- Fingerprint
f6-7c7aeadd45ef900d
Observed on the stored rows ?
- Degrees: 0, 0, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5, 5, 6, 6, 7 (half affine: slope 1, intercept 0)
- Palindromic rows: no
- γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
- Nonnegative coefficients (
nonn): yes - Only rational roots (
rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no
OEIS matches ?
No OEIS matches.
OEIS submission text ?
Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula
%F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows.
For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched;
the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a
finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.
The atlas's own rows: n = 0, …, ascending powers of x
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 0: 1; 1: 1; 2: 3, 2; 3: 9, 8; 4: 23, 54, 16; 5: 53, 324, 136; 6: 115, 1554, 1536, 272; 7: 241, 6384, 14976, 3968; 8: 495, 23726, 114528, 66048, 7936; 9: 1005, 82556, 731208, 937728, 176896;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy (2*n-5+8*x)*P(n,x) = -(4*n-6+(8*n^2-46*n+67)*x+(8*n^3-64*n^2+190*n-256)*x^2+(48*n^2-264*n+368)*x^3+(64*n-128)*x^4)*P(n-2,x) - ((2*n-3)*x+(4*n^2-24*n+35)*x^2-(16*n^2-88*n+144)*x^3-(96*n-240)*x^4-128*x^5)*d/dx P(n-2,x) + (6*n-13+(8*n^2-46*n+89)*x+(40*n-132)*x^2+32*x^3)*P(n-1,x) + ((2*n-5)*x-(8*n-28)*x^2-32*x^3)*d/dx P(n-1,x) for n >= 2, with P(0,x) = 1, P(1,x) = 1.
%t MathematicaP[0, x_] := 1;
P[1, x_] := 1;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[Together[(-(4*n - 6 + (8*n^2 - 46*n + 67)*x + (8*n^3 - 64*n^2 + 190*n - 256)*x^2 + (48*n^2 - 264*n + 368)*x^3 + (64*n - 128)*x^4)*P[n - 2, x] - ((2*n - 3)*x + (4*n^2 - 24*n + 35)*x^2 - (16*n^2 - 88*n + 144)*x^3 - (96*n - 240)*x^4 - 128*x^5)*D[P[n - 2, x], x] + (6*n - 13 + (8*n^2 - 46*n + 89)*x + (40*n - 132)*x^2 + 32*x^3)*P[n - 1, x] + ((2*n - 5)*x - (8*n - 28)*x^2 - 32*x^3)*D[P[n - 1, x], x])/(2*n - 5 + 8*x)]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 1; v[2] = 1; for(n = 2, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = (-(4*n - 6 + (8*n^2 - 46*n + 67)*x + (8*n^3 - 64*n^2 + 190*n - 256)*x^2 + (48*n^2 - 264*n + 368)*x^3 + (64*n - 128)*x^4)*v[i - 2] - ((2*n - 3)*x + (4*n^2 - 24*n + 35)*x^2 - (16*n^2 - 88*n + 144)*x^3 - (96*n - 240)*x^4 - 128*x^5)*deriv(v[i - 2], x) + (6*n - 13 + (8*n^2 - 46*n + 89)*x + (40*n - 132)*x^2 + 32*x^3)*v[i - 1] + ((2*n - 5)*x - (8*n - 28)*x^2 - 32*x^3)*deriv(v[i - 1], x))/(2*n - 5 + 8*x)); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
Proved properties
-
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-2394f256e051d5b6 -
Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 0: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-2394f256e051d5b6 -
Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 0, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-2394f256e051d5b6
Proof chains
1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON
-
preserver_image derivative_polynomial, shift 0
e-2394f256e051d5b6Laguerre’s theorem on differential operators [SP14] polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle T(n,k) (n >= 1, 0 <= k <= floor((n-1)/2)) read by rows, where T(n,k) = (k+1)T(n-1,k) + (2n-4k)T(n-1,k-1).
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
gamma_polynomial scale 1, shift 1
e-e49ea542bfed6bbfGamma criterion RealRooted IsGammaExpansion.isRealRooted_and_hasRootsNonpos_iff ?
-
premise (sequence):
eulerian
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 1, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
theorem_check liu_wang
e-ab3cdcfae289b48droot: theorem checkLiu–Wang theorem [LW07, Thm 2.1, Cor 2.4] ?
-
parent_provers root_domain
e-6c46c948823f0a8croot: theorem checkParent-row provers of polytool polytool ?
-
preserver_image reversal, shift 0
e-c61ecf4ef1c45372Affine, reversal and Möbius substitutions (elementary) polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
eulerian
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 1, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
premise (sequence):
eulerian
-
-
premise (sequence):
eulerian
-
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle T(n,k) (n >= 1, 0 <= k <= floor((n-1)/2)) read by rows, where T(n,k) = (k+1)T(n-1,k) + (2n-4k)T(n-1,k-1).
Related sequences ?
No candidate equalities or related sequences.
References
- [LW07] Lily L. Liu and Yi Wang. A unified approach to polynomial sequences with only real zeros. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 38(4):542–560, May 2007. doi:10.1016/j.aam.2006.02.003
- [SP14] J Schur and G Polya. Über zwei Arten von Faktorenfolgen in der Theorie der algebraischen Gleichungen. J. Reine Angew. Math., 1914.