A172431 → ⊙ C(n,k+1) (shift -1) → θ+1
nonnegative coefficients
Proved for all n: all roots real, in (−∞, 0] · coefficients of one sign · Hadamard kernel what this means
Rows ?
| n | x0 | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | Pn(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||||
| 3 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 12 | |||||
| 4 | 1 | 18 | 30 | 4 | 53 | ||||
| 5 | 1 | 32 | 126 | 80 | 5 | 244 | |||
| 6 | 1 | 50 | 360 | 560 | 175 | 6 | 1152 | ||
| 7 | 1 | 72 | 825 | 2400 | 1890 | 336 | 7 | 5531 | |
| 8 | 1 | 98 | 1638 | 7700 | 11550 | 5292 | 588 | 8 | 26875 |
Computed in your browser ?
Technical details
- Node id
n-012ae01d9db4fd27· revision 1 · JSON- Definition source
derived:theta_plus_one- Fingerprint
f6-c6c82bb93c30543f
Observed on the stored rows ?
- Degrees: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 (affine: slope 1, intercept -1)
- Palindromic rows: no
- γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
- Nonnegative coefficients (
nonn): yes - Only rational roots (
rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no
OEIS matches ?
- A262442: row sums, 15 terms agree OEIS nonn (row-sum match: finite agreement only) · view at the OEIS
OEIS submission text ?
Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula
%F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows.
For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched;
the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a
finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.
The atlas's own rows: n = 1, …, ascending powers of x
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 1: 1; 2: 1, 2; 3: 1, 8, 3; 4: 1, 18, 30, 4; 5: 1, 32, 126, 80, 5; 6: 1, 50, 360, 560, 175, 6; 7: 1, 72, 825, 2400, 1890, 336, 7; 8: 1, 98, 1638, 7700, 11550, 5292, 588, 8; 9: 1, 128, 2940, 20384, 50050, 44352, 12936, 960, 9; 10: 1, 162, 4896, 47040, 171990, 252252, 144144, 28512, 1485, 10;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy (4*n^3-10*n^2+8*n-2)*P(n,x) = (4*n^3-10*n^2+8*n-2+(36*n^3-132*n^2+152*n-52)*x)*P(n-1,x) + ((8*n^2-18*n+8)*x-(52*n^2-134*n+62)*x^2)*d/dx P(n-1,x) - ((5*n-3)*x^2-(20*n-12)*x^3)*d^2/dx^2 P(n-1,x) for n >= 2, with P(1,x) = 1.
%t MathematicaP[1, x_] := 1;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[Together[((4*n^3 - 10*n^2 + 8*n - 2 + (36*n^3 - 132*n^2 + 152*n - 52)*x)*P[n - 1, x] + ((8*n^2 - 18*n + 8)*x - (52*n^2 - 134*n + 62)*x^2)*D[P[n - 1, x], x] - ((5*n - 3)*x^2 - (20*n - 12)*x^3)*D[P[n - 1, x], {x, 2}])/(4*n^3 - 10*n^2 + 8*n - 2)]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 1, 10}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N)); v[1] = 1; for(n = 2, N, my(i = n); v[i] = ((4*n^3 - 10*n^2 + 8*n - 2 + (36*n^3 - 132*n^2 + 152*n - 52)*x)*v[i - 1] + ((8*n^2 - 18*n + 8)*x - (52*n^2 - 134*n + 62)*x^2)*deriv(v[i - 1], x) - ((5*n - 3)*x^2 - (20*n - 12)*x^3)*deriv(deriv(v[i - 1], x), x))/(4*n^3 - 10*n^2 + 8*n - 2)); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i, v[i])))};
T(10)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
Proved properties
-
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 1, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-fe1ef6d74823af06 -
Coefficients of one sign. Every nonzero row, n >= 1: the coefficients of P_n have one sign
All coefficients of each polynomial have the same sign (after x -> -x when alternating).derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-fe1ef6d74823af06 -
Hadamard kernel (Malo). Rows P_n, n >= 1, are Hadamard kernels (preserve real-rootedness)
Multiplying the coefficients of any real-rooted polynomial termwise by those of a row (Hadamard product) gives a real-rooted polynomial again.derived from the cited steps by a stated theorem:
e-fe1ef6d74823af06
Proof chains
1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON
-
preserver_image euler_polynomial, shift 0
e-fe1ef6d74823af06Laguerre’s theorem on multiplier sequences [SP14; Bra15, Thm 40] polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle read by rows: T(n,k) = binomial(n+1,k+1)*binomial(2*n-k+1,k)/(n+1), 0<=k<=n.
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 1, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
preserver_image hadamard_multiplier, shift -1
e-1491609a6fc5f8c9Pólya–Schur theorem on multiplier sequences [SP14; Bra15, Thm 40] polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
Even row Pascal-square read by antidiagonals.
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-inf, 0]
-
theorem_check three_term_recurrence
e-83282836b5ac538eroot: theorem checkThree-term recurrence criterion [Sze39, §3.3; Fav35] polytool ?
-
-
premise (sequence):
Even row Pascal-square read by antidiagonals.
-
-
premise (sequence):
Triangle read by rows: T(n,k) = binomial(n+1,k+1)*binomial(2*n-k+1,k)/(n+1), 0<=k<=n.
Related sequences ?
No candidate equalities or related sequences.
References
- [Bra15] Petter Brändén. Unimodality, log-concavity, real-rootedness and beyond. Handbook of enumerative combinatorics, :437–483, March 2015. doi:10.1201/b18255-10
- [Fav35] Jean Favard. Sur les polynômes de tchebicheff. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 200:2052–2053, 1935.
- [SP14] J Schur and G Polya. Über zwei Arten von Faktorenfolgen in der Theorie der algebraischen Gleichungen. J. Reine Angew. Math., 1914.
- [Sze39] G. Szegő. Orthogonal Polynomials. Colloquium publications, American Mathematical Society, 1939. doi:10.1090/coll/023