A113953 → x ↦ x−3
Proved for all n: all roots real, in (−5, 3] · interlacing (weak) what this means
Rows ?
| n | x0 | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | Pn(1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| 1 | -3 | 1 | -2 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | -4 | 1 | 0 | |||||
| 3 | 9 | 3 | -5 | 1 | 8 | ||||
| 4 | -45 | 30 | 4 | -6 | 1 | -16 | |||
| 5 | 81 | -135 | 54 | 6 | -7 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 6 | 27 | 216 | -261 | 80 | 9 | -8 | 1 | 64 | |
| 7 | -567 | 351 | 405 | -429 | 107 | 13 | -9 | 1 | -128 |
Computed in your browser ?
Technical details
- Node id
n-0038b0ec9e792748· revision 1 · JSON- Definition source
derived:basis_map_coefficients_of:oeis_catalog:A113953- Fingerprint
f6-6897785a472f0d9f
Observed on the stored rows ?
- Degrees: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 (affine: slope 1, intercept 0)
- Palindromic rows: no
- γ-positive (gamma_positive): no
- Nonnegative coefficients (
nonn): no - Only rational roots (
rr_by_factors: every nonzero row is a product of linear factors over ℚ): no
OEIS matches ?
No OEIS matches.
OEIS submission text ?
Fields to paste into an OEIS submission: the example %e, the formula
%F and programs %t (Mathematica) and %o (PARI/GP) that list the same rows.
For an OEIS link the row numbers, the offset and the orientation are those of the entry, as matched;
the matched terms were compared with the published ones, which identifies the node with the entry on a
finite prefix, not for every n. The PARI/GP program is not machine-checked here.
The atlas's own rows: n = 0, …, ascending powers of x
%e ExampleTriangle begins: 0: 1; 1: -3, 1; 2: 3, -4, 1; 3: 9, 3, -5, 1; 4: -45, 30, 4, -6, 1; 5: 81, -135, 54, 6, -7, 1; 6: 27, 216, -261, 80, 9, -8, 1; 7: -567, 351, 405, -429, 107, 13, -9, 1; 8: 1539, -2862, 1134, 690, -644, 134, 18, -10, 1; 9: -1215, 6885, -7992, 2448, 1122, -910, 160, 24, -11, 1;
%F FormulaThe row polynomials satisfy P(n,x) = -(3-x)*P(n-1,x) - (6-2*x)*P(n-2,x) for n >= 2, with P(0,x) = 1, P(1,x) = -3 + x.
%t MathematicaP[0, x_] := 1;
P[1, x_] := -3 + x;
P[n_, x_] := P[n, x] = Expand[-(3 - x)*P[n - 1, x] - (6 - 2*x)*P[n - 2, x]];
Table[CoefficientList[P[n, x], x], {n, 0, 9}] // Flatten%o PARI/GPP(N) = {my(v = vector(N + 1)); v[1] = 1; v[2] = -3 + x; for(n = 2, N, my(i = n + 1); v[i] = -(3 - x)*v[i - 1] - (6 - 2*x)*v[i - 2]); v};
row(n, p) = {my(c = Vecrev(p)); c};
T(N) = {my(v = P(N)); concat(vector(#v, i, row(i - 1, v[i])))};
T(9)Generated with polytool c48629374597.
Proved properties
-
Real-rooted. Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-5, 3]
Every polynomial of the sequence has only real roots, inside the stated interval.by the cited steps:
e-5f9e6216c74dfca3 -
Interlacing of consecutive rows. Rows P_(m-1), P_m interlace (weak, unordered) for every m >= 1
The roots of consecutive polynomials alternate on the real line.by the cited steps:
e-5f9e6216c74dfca3
Proof chains
1 incoming proof step. Each step is expanded back to the roots of the proof DAG, the theorem checks of a node's own rule. JSON
-
preserver_image affine, shift 0
e-5f9e6216c74dfca3Affine, reversal and Möbius substitutions (elementary) polytool ?
-
premise (sequence):
A Jacobsthal triangle.
uses: Every row P_n, n >= 0, is zero or real-rooted with all roots in (-8, 0]
-
theorem_check ma_wang_interval
e-2d5b16bf2955a407root: theorem checkMa–Wang interval theorem [MW08, Thm 2, Cor 3] RealRooted RealRooted.affineEndpointStep_closed ?
-
-
premise (sequence):
A Jacobsthal triangle.
Used in 1 proof step
e-76bf35985f9d5eb4basis_map (A027465) → A Jacobsthal triangle.
Related sequences ?
No candidate equalities or related sequences.
References
- [MW08] Shi-Mei Ma and Yi Wang. q-Eulerian polynomials and polynomials with only real zeros. The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, 15(1):Research Paper 17, January 2008. doi:10.37236/741